chore(findings): opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-api
Summary
opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-api has 221 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: opensource/metrostar/miniconda:miniconda_v7 is EOL, please update if possible
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.4 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-api&tag=dask_gateway_api_v1&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-45288 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.67599 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45288 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.67599 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24787 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.01583 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24784 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.01498 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00715 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00715 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00715 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00715 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8508 | Anchore CVE | Medium | unbound-libs-1.16.2-17.el9 | 0.00670 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9143 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-3.3.2 | 0.00652 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24791 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00618 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24791 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00618 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45289 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00409 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45289 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00409 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24783 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00401 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24783 | Twistlock CVE | Low | crypto/x509-1.21.6 | 0.00401 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45290 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00362 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45290 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/textproto-1.21.6 | 0.00362 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00271 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00271 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00271 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00271 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24785 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00246 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12797 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-3.3.2 | 0.00222 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12797 | Twistlock CVE | Low | cryptography-43.0.1 | 0.00222 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49794 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00202 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49794 | Anchore CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00202 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49796 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00200 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49796 | Anchore CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00200 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34156 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00178 | false | ||
CVE-2024-52304 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.10.5 | Most users do not use the Python parser. | Use the default C parser. | 0.00168 | false |
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.5 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.5 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.5 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.5 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-70.1.0 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-73.0.1 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00117 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00117 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00117 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00117 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34155 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00115 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24790 | Anchore CVE | Critical | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24790 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | net/netip-1.21.6 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6021 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00089 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6021 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00089 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34158 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00082 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-3.3.2 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-57804 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | h2-4.1.0 | 0.00062 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47907 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00054 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.5 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-53643 | Twistlock CVE | Low | aiohttp-3.10.5 | If the above conditions are met which is already unlikely, they are affected. | 0.00044 | false | |
CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2024-45336 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2024-45336 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | requests-2.32.3 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.25.1-9.el9 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47081 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-requests-2.25.1-9.el9 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2024-45341 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2024-45341 | Twistlock CVE | Low | crypto/x509-1.21.6 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5994 | Twistlock CVE | High | unbound-1.16.2-17.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5994 | Anchore CVE | High | unbound-libs-1.16.2-17.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6020 | Twistlock CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6020 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32989 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8941 | Twistlock CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8941 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-14.2-4.el9 | 0.00022 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.el9 | 0.00022 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.5 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4673 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00019 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4673 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00019 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-7425 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2025-7425 | Anchore CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00015 | false |
CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | Pyodide is extremely rare configuration for users in production. | 0.00013 | false | |
CVE-2025-22871 | Anchore CVE | Critical | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2025-22871 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http/internal-1.21.6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2025-22866 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00010 | false | ||
CVE-2025-22866 | Twistlock CVE | Low | crypto/internal/nistec-1.21.6 | 0.00010 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4674 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24789 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2025-9714 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
PRISMA-2023-0024 | Twistlock CVE | High | aiohttp-3.10.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-24.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 | Anchore CVE | Medium | requests-2.32.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj | Anchore CVE | Low | aiohttp-3.10.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-8495-4g3g-x7pr | Anchore CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.10.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-847f-9342-265h | Anchore CVE | Medium | h2-4.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g | Anchore CVE | Low | cryptography-43.0.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-73.0.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-70.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-48p4-8xcf-vxj5 | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-48p4-8xcf-vxj5 | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
CCE-83629-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-api&tag=dask_gateway_api_v1&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.