chore(findings): opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-controller
Summary
opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-controller has 228 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: opensource/metrostar/miniconda:miniconda_v7 is EOL, please update if possible
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.4 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-controller&tag=dask_gateway_controller_v1&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-45288 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.67599 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45288 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.67599 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-5535 | Anchore CVE | Critical | openssl-3.3.1 | 0.03505 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24787 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.01583 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24784 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.01498 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00715 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00715 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00715 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00715 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6119 | Anchore CVE | High | openssl-3.3.1 | 0.00672 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8508 | Anchore CVE | Medium | unbound-libs-1.16.2-17.el9 | 0.00670 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9143 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-3.3.1 | 0.00652 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24791 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00618 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24791 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00618 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45289 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00409 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45289 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00409 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24783 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00401 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24783 | Twistlock CVE | Low | crypto/x509-1.21.6 | 0.00401 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45290 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00362 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45290 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/textproto-1.21.6 | 0.00362 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00271 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00271 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00271 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12254 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00271 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42367 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.10.1 | Requires using static routes via aiohttp not recommended practice and some way for an attacker to get a symlink into the servers static directory. | Use a reverse proxy or ensure that symlinks cant be put into the static directory by users. | 0.00267 | false |
| CVE-2024-24785 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00246 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12797 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-3.3.1 | 0.00222 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12797 | Twistlock CVE | Low | cryptography-43.0.0 | 0.00222 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-49794 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00202 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-49794 | Anchore CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00202 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-49796 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00200 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-49796 | Anchore CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00200 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34156 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00178 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-52304 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.10.1 | Most users do not use the Python parser. | Use the default C parser. | 0.00168 | false |
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.4 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.4 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.4 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.12.4 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-70.1.0 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-72.1.0 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34155 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00115 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24790 | Anchore CVE | Critical | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24790 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | net/netip-1.21.6 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6021 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6021 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34158 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00082 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-3.3.1 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00068 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00068 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00068 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00068 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-57804 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | h2-4.1.0 | 0.00062 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5702 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47907 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00054 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.12.4 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53643 | Twistlock CVE | Low | aiohttp-3.10.1 | If the above conditions are met which is already unlikely, they are affected. | 0.00044 | false | |
| CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-51.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45336 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45336 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | requests-2.32.3 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.25.1-9.el9 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-requests-2.25.1-9.el9 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45341 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45341 | Twistlock CVE | Low | crypto/x509-1.21.6 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5994 | Twistlock CVE | High | unbound-1.16.2-17.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5994 | Anchore CVE | High | unbound-libs-1.16.2-17.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6020 | Twistlock CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6020 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8941 | Twistlock CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8941 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-23.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-14.2-4.el9 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.el9 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.4 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.12.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4673 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http-1.21.6 | 0.00019 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4673 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00019 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7425 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7425 | Anchore CVE | High | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00015 | false |
| CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | Pyodide is extremely rare configuration for users in production. | 0.00013 | false | |
| CVE-2025-22871 | Anchore CVE | Critical | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-22871 | Twistlock CVE | Low | net/http/internal-1.21.6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-22866 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00010 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-22866 | Twistlock CVE | Low | crypto/internal/nistec-1.21.6 | 0.00010 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4802 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.14 | 0.00008 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4674 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-24789 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.21.6 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9714 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-9.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
| GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-jwhx-xcg6-8xhj | Anchore CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.10.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | cryptography-43.0.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cryptography-43.0.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 | Anchore CVE | Medium | requests-2.32.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-9548-qrrj-x5pj | Anchore CVE | Low | aiohttp-3.10.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-8495-4g3g-x7pr | Anchore CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.10.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-847f-9342-265h | Anchore CVE | Medium | h2-4.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g | Anchore CVE | Low | cryptography-43.0.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-72.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-70.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-48p4-8xcf-vxj5 | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-48p4-8xcf-vxj5 | Anchore CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.2.2 | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/309theddge/dask-gateway-controller&tag=dask_gateway_controller_v1&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN