chore(findings): aiml/azure/azure-cli
Summary
aiml/azure/azure-cli has 175 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.4 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=aiml/azure/azure-cli&tag=2.60.0&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-1931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.06753 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-1931 | Anchore CVE | Medium | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.06753 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.02915 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.02915 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.9-12.el9 | 0.02806 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-39689 | Twistlock CVE | Low | certifi-2023.7.22 | 0.01928 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9681 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.00473 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9681 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.00473 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9681 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.00473 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-37891 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.26.18 | Theres no reason to set ProxyAuthorization without using urllib3s proxy support. | Using the ProxyAuthorization header with urllib3s ProxyManager. Disabling HTTP redirects using redirectsFalse when sending requests. Not using the ProxyAuthorization header. | 0.00261 | false |
| CVE-2024-34064 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | jinja2-3.1.3 | This requires using a specific filter in an uncommon way. | Prefilter user input that you plan to pass as the keys. Values do not need to be filtered, as they are already escaped. | 0.00259 | false |
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-69.5.1 | Most users have migrated off of the code paths that are affected. The affected code paths are actively deprecated and planned for turn down. Only specialized and legacy workflows are affected. | Use recommended installers pip, uv, build, system package managers to install all packages from trusted indexes. If working with untrusted content in private indexes, consider scanning for malicious code in the package index pages. | 0.00227 | false |
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12797 | Twistlock CVE | High | cryptography-42.0.5 | 0.00222 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1153 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00185 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1153 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00185 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.00171 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.00171 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9_6.1 | 0.00171 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00158 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00158 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | setuptools-69.5.1 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00136 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00136 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-17.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-17.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56326 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | jinja2-3.1.3 | This vulnerability impacts applications which execute untrusted templates. This is uncommon for web and other document rendering use cases, but may be common in deployment tools that allow third party plugins. | 0.00118 | false | |
| CVE-2021-45941 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libbpf-2:1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-45941 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libbpf-1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-45940 | Anchore CVE | Low | libbpf-2:1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-45940 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libbpf-1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00102 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00102 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00088 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00088 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00088 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00075 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00075 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56201 | Twistlock CVE | High | jinja2-3.1.3 | This vulnerability impacts applications which execute untrusted templates where the template author can also choose the template filename. This is uncommon for web and other document rendering use cases, but may be common in deployment tools that allow third party plugins. | Check if any template filenames contain curly braces and . If so, and the braces enclose Python code, audit or remove those files. | 0.00074 | false |
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.2-10.20210508.el9_6.2 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9_6.2 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9_6.2 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgomp-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27516 | Twistlock CVE | High | jinja2-3.1.3 | This vulnerability impacts applications which execute untrusted templates. This is uncommon for web and other document rendering use cases, but may be common in deployment tools that allow third party plugins. | 0.00046 | false | |
| CVE-2024-35195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | requests-2.31.0 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5914 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5914 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | requests-2.31.0 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57360 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7458 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | sqlite-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7458 | Anchore CVE | Medium | sqlite-libs-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-12.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47011 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47010 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47007 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.26.18 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00013 | false |
| CVE-2023-30571 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-30571 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-3606 | Anchore CVE | Low | libbpf-2:1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00010 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-3606 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libbpf-1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00010 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-2222 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
| b18c88ddeab24abfb92ae2ccddb0b022 | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-24.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | cryptography-42.0.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| CCE-83450-7 | OSCAP Compliance | High | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=aiml/azure/azure-cli&tag=2.60.0&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN