chore(findings): aperio-global/russel/database
Summary
aperio-global/russel/database has 198 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: opensource/mongodb/mongodb_7.x:7.0.11 is EOL, please update if possible
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.4 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=aperio-global/russel/database&tag=1.0&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-3596 | Anchore CVE | High | krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.29718 | false | ||
CVE-2024-3596 | Twistlock CVE | High | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.29718 | false | ||
CVE-2020-11023 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcc-11.4.1-3.el9 | 0.21547 | true | ||
CVE-2020-11023 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libstdc++-11.4.1-3.el9 | 0.21547 | true | ||
CVE-2020-11023 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgomp-11.4.1-3.el9 | 0.21547 | true | ||
CVE-2020-11023 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gcc-11.4.1-3.el9 | 0.21547 | true | ||
CVE-2024-6345 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-setuptools-wheel-53.0.0-12.el9 | 0.10079 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6345 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-setuptools-53.0.0-12.el9 | 0.10079 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-setuptools-53.0.0-12.el9 | 0.10079 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.07100 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.07100 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7264 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.07100 | false | ||
CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.9-8.el9 | 0.02806 | false | ||
CVE-2024-2398 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | curl-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.01962 | false | ||
CVE-2024-37371 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.01935 | false | ||
CVE-2024-52533 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.01786 | false | ||
CVE-2024-52533 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.01786 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2015-1609 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | mongos-1.3.6 | 0.01347 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4032 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00735 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4032 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00735 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4032 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00735 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9681 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.00571 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9681 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.00571 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9681 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.00571 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8176 | Anchore CVE | Medium | expat-2.5.0-2.el9_4 | 0.00505 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8176 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | expat-2.5.0-2.el9_4 | 0.00505 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.00361 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.00361 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11053 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-29.el9_4 | 0.00361 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00348 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00348 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00348 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00348 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11168 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00327 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11168 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00327 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11168 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00327 | false | ||
CVE-2024-37370 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.00305 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12797 | Anchore CVE | High | openssl-1:3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00259 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12797 | Anchore CVE | High | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00259 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12797 | Twistlock CVE | High | openssl-3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00259 | false | ||
CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pip-21.2.3-8.el9 | 0.00240 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1153 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00212 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1153 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00212 | false | ||
CVE-2024-26458 | Twistlock CVE | Low | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.00206 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00179 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00179 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00166 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00166 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00166 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2024-37891 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.26.5-5.el9 | 0.00142 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-setuptools-53.0.0-12.el9 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47273 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-setuptools-wheel-53.0.0-12.el9 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47273 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-setuptools-53.0.0-12.el9 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4373 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00107 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4373 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00107 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Twistlock CVE | High | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1152 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1152 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1150 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1150 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00089 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00089 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6923 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00089 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1151 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00086 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1151 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00086 | false | ||
CVE-2025-48060 | Anchore CVE | High | jq-1.6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
CVE-2024-26461 | Twistlock CVE | Low | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.00081 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-27.el9 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2016-6494 | Twistlock CVE | Low | mongos-1.3.6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | expat-2.5.0-2.el9_4 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | expat-2.5.0-2.el9_4 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1377 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5702 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2024-23337 | Anchore CVE | Medium | jq-1.6 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3360 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
CVE-2025-7039 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-14.el9 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-11.4.1-3.el9 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1376 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3576 | Anchore CVE | Medium | krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.00047 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3576 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.00047 | false | ||
CVE-2025-45582 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-1.34-6.el9_1 | 0.00042 | false | ||
CVE-2025-45582 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.34-6.el9_1 | 0.00042 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-32.el9_4 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-32.el9_4 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-32.el9_4 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-32.el9_4 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-32.el9_4 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00029 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00029 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00029 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1371 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00029 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6020 | Twistlock CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-19.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6020 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-19.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8941 | Twistlock CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-19.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8941 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.5.1-19.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2024-57360 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2024-57360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2024-26462 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00022 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00022 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-3.el9_4.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.32-35.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.32-35.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-21.2.3-8.el9 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-21.2.3-8.el9 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-21.2.3-8.el9 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-21.2.3-8.el9 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2024-53427 | Anchore CVE | High | jq-1.6 | 0.00012 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3198 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3198 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-10.2-13.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4802 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-100.el9_4.2 | 0.00008 | false | ||
CVE-2025-24528 | Anchore CVE | Medium | krb5-libs-1.21.1-1.el9 | N/A | false | ||
CVE-2025-24528 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-1.21.1-1.el9 | N/A | false | ||
RHSA-2024:9474 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:9468 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:9404 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:9371 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:9333 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:9331 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:8446 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:6783 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:6754 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:6464 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:6166 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:6163 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:6162 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:5534 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:5529 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHSA-2024:4779 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHBA-2024:6679 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
RHBA-2024:5691 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-83623-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=aperio-global/russel/database&tag=1.0&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.