chore(findings): cintel-inc/webapps/django-prod
Summary
cintel-inc/webapps/django-prod has 409 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi8:8.7 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=cintel-inc/webapps/django-prod&tag=0.1.2&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
CVE-2023-2650 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
CVE-2024-27316 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37 | 0.87121 | false | ||
CVE-2023-24580 | Twistlock CVE | High | django-4.1.2 | Does not require authenticated users, but requires resource exhaustion strategy to exploit. | Block size of file uploads in upstream HTML proxy. | 0.12511 | false |
CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-65.5.1 | Most users have migrated off of the code paths that are affected. The affected code paths are actively deprecated and planned for turn down. Only specialized and legacy workflows are affected. | Use recommended installers pip, uv, build, system package managers to install all packages from trusted indexes. If working with untrusted content in private indexes, consider scanning for malicious code in the package index pages. | 0.10079 | false |
CVE-2020-19188 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.07066 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19188 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.07066 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19188 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.07066 | false | ||
CVE-2019-17567 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd:2.4-8100020250728150834:489197e6 | 0.05655 | false | ||
CVE-2019-17567 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.05655 | false | ||
CVE-2019-17567 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.05655 | false | ||
CVE-2019-17567 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.05655 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19186 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19186 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19186 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19185 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19185 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19185 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19190 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04954 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19190 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04954 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19190 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04954 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19187 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04834 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19187 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04834 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19187 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04834 | false | ||
CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
CVE-2023-36053 | Twistlock CVE | High | django-4.1.2 | Almost all Django application deployments validate emails or URLs. | Manually restrict of the lengths of email and URL inputs manually before they are passed to the builtin validator. | 0.04078 | false |
CVE-2019-9936 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03924 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9936 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03924 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9937 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03622 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9937 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03622 | false | ||
CVE-2022-23990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-17.el8_10 | 0.03519 | false | ||
CVE-2022-23990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-17.el8_10 | 0.03519 | false | ||
CVE-2005-2541 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.03250 | false | ||
CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.6-22.el8 | 0.02806 | false | ||
CVE-2023-46695 | Twistlock CVE | High | django-4.1.2 | 0.02674 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02620 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02620 | false | ||
CVE-2020-19189 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02620 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.02574 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.02574 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7264 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.02574 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.02537 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.02537 | false | ||
CVE-2023-23969 | Twistlock CVE | High | django-4.1.2 | Remotely exploitable. | Filter very large values HTTP headers | 0.02195 | false |
CVE-2024-2511 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
CVE-2024-2511 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
CVE-2024-2511 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | httpd:2.4-8100020250728150834:489197e6 | 0.01914 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24795 | Anchore CVE | Low | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.01914 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24795 | Anchore CVE | Low | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.01914 | false | ||
CVE-2024-24795 | Anchore CVE | Low | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.01914 | false | ||
CVE-2018-1000880 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01747 | false | ||
CVE-2018-1000880 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01747 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | mod_wsgi-4.6.4-5.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
CVE-2023-43665 | Twistlock CVE | High | django-4.1.2 | 0.01454 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0464 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.01309 | false | ||
CVE-2019-16866 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
CVE-2019-16866 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
CVE-2019-16866 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9674 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9674 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
CVE-2018-1000879 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01112 | false | ||
CVE-2018-1000879 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01112 | false | ||
CVE-2020-21674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00915 | false | ||
CVE-2020-21674 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00915 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00735 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-syspurpose-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-cloud-what-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-subscription-manager-rhsm-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | dnf-plugin-subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-rhsm-certificates-20220623-1.el8 | 0.00512 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0466 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
CVE-2025-53020 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37 | 0.00455 | false | ||
CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00455 | false | ||
CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00455 | false | ||
CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00455 | false | ||
CVE-2023-41164 | Twistlock CVE | High | django-4.1.2 | 0.00425 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9923 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00408 | false | ||
CVE-2019-9923 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00408 | false | ||
CVE-2018-19217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00404 | false | ||
CVE-2018-19217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00404 | false | ||
CVE-2024-42516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37 | 0.00369 | false | ||
CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00369 | false | ||
CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00369 | false | ||
CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00369 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11053 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49630 | Anchore CVE | Medium | mod_http2-1.15.7-10.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.4 | 0.00347 | false | ||
CVE-2021-39537 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00342 | false | ||
CVE-2021-39537 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00342 | false | ||
CVE-2021-39537 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00342 | false | ||
CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00338 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
CVE-2023-0465 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0727 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
CVE-2024-2236 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00301 | false | ||
CVE-2024-2236 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00301 | false | ||
CVE-2019-12904 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00290 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11168 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00278 | false | ||
CVE-2018-19211 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
CVE-2018-19211 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
CVE-2018-19211 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
CVE-2023-40217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00266 | false | ||
CVE-2022-2255 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | mod_wsgi-4.6.4-5.el8 | 0.00266 | false | ||
CVE-2019-19244 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00256 | false | ||
CVE-2019-19244 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00256 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43204 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37 | 0.00231 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00231 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00231 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00231 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1153 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00212 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1153 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00212 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python-3.10.9 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00179 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00179 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27534 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27534 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20657 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
CVE-2018-20657 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0450 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00173 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34459 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
CVE-2021-4209 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00148 | false | ||
CVE-2021-4209 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00148 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.10.9 | 0.00146 | false | ||
CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-65.5.1 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1632 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00136 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1632 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00136 | false | ||
CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00127 | false | ||
CVE-2019-14250 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00127 | false | ||
CVE-2019-14250 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00127 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2023-29499 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2023-29499 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2018-1000654 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-5.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2018-1000654 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-5.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4741 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00116 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4741 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00116 | false | ||
CVE-2024-4741 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00116 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
CVE-2019-8905 | Anchore CVE | Medium | file-libs-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00105 | false | ||
CVE-2019-8905 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | file-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00105 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2021-20193 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2021-20193 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00097 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00096 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1152 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1152 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1150 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1150 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2024-22195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2024-22195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00091 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2019-8906 | Anchore CVE | Low | file-libs-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2019-8906 | Twistlock CVE | Low | file-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00089 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1151 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1151 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
CVE-2022-4899 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | zstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47252 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00084 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47252 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00084 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47252 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00084 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49812 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00083 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49812 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00083 | false | ||
CVE-2025-49812 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00083 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
CVE-2023-6597 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00079 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00076 | false | ||
CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00076 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00068 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00067 | false | ||
CVE-2025-23048 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2025-23048 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2025-23048 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.37-65.module+el8.10.0+23369+11a81384.5 | 0.00065 | false | ||
CVE-2023-31047 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | django-4.1.2 | Unlikely that Django application uses forms.FileField or forms.ImageField, uses one form field to upload multiple files.. and that validation is important. Note that this was never officially supported, even though the documentation suggested otherwise. | Disable multiple file uploads at the HTTP level eg. in nginx or other proxy | 0.00063 | false |
CVE-2021-24032 | Anchore CVE | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00062 | false | ||
CVE-2021-24032 | Twistlock CVE | Low | zstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00062 | false | ||
CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-10.32-3.el8_6 | 0.00061 | false | ||
CVE-2022-41409 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pcre2-10.32-3.el8_6 | 0.00061 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32665 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00059 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32665 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00059 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00057 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00057 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00056 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00056 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5318 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27113 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00052 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3360 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00052 | false | ||
CVE-2025-7039 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5987 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2023-50495 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5372 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5372 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5372 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.10.9 | 0.00048 | false | ||
CVE-2024-35195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00044 | false | ||
CVE-2023-5752 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pip-22.3 | Only users using Mercurial VCS functionality with untrusted inputs are affected. | 0.00044 | false | |
CVE-2025-45582 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00042 | false | ||
CVE-2025-45582 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00042 | false | ||
CVE-2023-39804 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
CVE-2023-39804 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32611 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2023-32611 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00037 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5351 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00034 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00034 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00034 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43167 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
CVE-2025-48432 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | django-4.1.2 | 0.00031 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43168 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
CVE-2023-4156 | Anchore CVE | Low | gawk-4.2.1-4.el8 | 0.00031 | false | ||
CVE-2023-4156 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gawk-4.2.1-4.el8 | 0.00031 | false | ||
CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32989 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00026 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8941 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.3.1-38.el8_10 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2024-57360 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2024-57360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00022 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00022 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.10.9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5918 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5918 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.30-15.el8 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.30-15.el8 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0232 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2025-30258 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2025-30258 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-common-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-libs-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-daemon-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-tools-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
CVE-2025-25724 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00016 | false | ||
CVE-2025-25724 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00016 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8114 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5917 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5917 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.24.2 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00015 | false |
CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4878 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5915 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2025-5915 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47011 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47010 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47007 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
CVE-2024-57970 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00012 | false | ||
CVE-2024-57970 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00012 | false | ||
CVE-2022-3219 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00012 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3198 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00011 | false | ||
CVE-2025-3198 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00011 | false | ||
CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2021-33294 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | elfutils-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
CVE-2025-9714 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | N/A | false | ||
CVE-2023-2222 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | N/A | false | ||
addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-22.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-rrqc-c2jx-6jgv | Anchore CVE | Medium | django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-r3xc-prgr-mg9p | Anchore CVE | Critical | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-qmf9-6jqf-j8fq | Anchore CVE | High | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-q2jf-h9jm-m7p4 | Anchore CVE | High | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-mq26-g339-26xf | Anchore CVE | Medium | pip-22.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-jh3w-4vvf-mjgr | Anchore CVE | High | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-h8gc-pgj2-vjm3 | Anchore CVE | High | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-cx63-2mw6-8hw5 | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-65.5.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-7xr5-9hcq-chf9 | Anchore CVE | Medium | django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-7h4p-27mh-hmrw | Anchore CVE | Medium | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-5rjg-fvgr-3xxf | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-65.5.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 | Anchore CVE | High | Django-4.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
CCE-89707-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-86473-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-86106-2 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-85902-5 | OSCAP Compliance | High | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-85899-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-85897-7 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-85870-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-84255-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-84254-2 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-82730-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-81044-0 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80935-0 | OSCAP Compliance | High | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80854-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80853-5 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80852-7 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80851-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80839-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80838-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80837-8 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
CCE-80664-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=cintel-inc/webapps/django-prod&tag=0.1.2&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.