chore(findings): cintel-inc/webapps/sftp
Summary
cintel-inc/webapps/sftp has 196 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-32681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-requests-2.20.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-28322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-27538 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-27538 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-gconv-extra-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2021-32256 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2021-44568 | Anchore CVE | Low | libsolv-0.7.20-4.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-28320 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-28322 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-3446 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-28320 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2020-35342 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-19726 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47007 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47673 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-35205 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47008 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-19724 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-45703 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47011 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-21490 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-44840 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-35206 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2021-46174 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47696 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47695 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47010 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-48063 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-48065 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-48064 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-22916 | Anchore CVE | Low | xz-libs-5.2.4-4.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-48554 | Anchore CVE | Low | file-libs-5.33-24.el8 |
CVE-2023-39615 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-16.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-40217 | Anchore CVE | High | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-40217 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4641 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.6-17.el8 |
CVE-2023-39615 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-16.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-gconv-extra-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-gconv-extra-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-gconv-extra-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4039 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcc-8.5.0-18.el8 |
CVE-2023-4039 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libstdc++-8.5.0-18.el8 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-19185 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19190 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19190 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19187 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19186 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19187 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nss-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-19185 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19188 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nss-util-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nss-softokn-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-19188 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nss-sysinit-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19186 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2019-25033 | Anchore CVE | Medium | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.el8 |
CVE-2019-25033 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.el8 |
CVE-2021-39537 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-36632 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2021-39537 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-30571 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-5.el8 |
CVE-2023-36632 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-30571 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-5.el8 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-2222 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-2953 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openldap-2.4.46-18.el8 |
CVE-2023-2650 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-32665 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-161.el8 |
CVE-2023-32611 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-161.el8 |
CVE-2023-29499 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-161.el8 |
CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-161.el8 |
CVE-2020-17049 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-libs-1.18.2-25.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-19244 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-18.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-9937 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-18.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-9936 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-18.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-3446 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-3817 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-32256 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-4156 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gawk-4.2.1-4.el8 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-daemon-1.12.8-24.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-libs-1.12.8-24.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-common-1.12.8-24.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1.12.8-24.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-tools-1.12.8-24.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-28322 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-28322 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-30.el8_8.3 |
CVE-2021-33294 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.188-3.el8 |
CVE-2021-33294 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.188-3.el8 |
CVE-2021-33294 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.188-3.el8 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-rhsm-certificates-1.28.36-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dnf-plugin-subscription-manager-1.28.36-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-subscription-manager-rhsm-1.28.36-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-cloud-what-1.28.36-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.36-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-syspurpose-1.28.36-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-48065 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-48064 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-48063 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-35205 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-21490 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-19726 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-19724 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47696 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47695 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47673 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47008 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-45703 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-44840 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2022-35206 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2021-46174 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2020-35342 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-40217 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | python3-libs-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-40217 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | platform-python-3.6.8-51.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4641 | Twistlock CVE | Low | shadow-utils-4.6-17.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4527 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4813 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4806 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.28-225.el8 |
CVE-2023-4039 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libstdc++-8.5.0-18.el8 |
CVE-2023-4039 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libgcc-8.5.0-18.el8 |
CVE-2023-29491 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-29491 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-30630 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dmidecode-3.3-4.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nss-util-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nss-sysinit-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nss-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nss-softokn-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-4421 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-19190 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19190 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19189 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19189 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19188 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19188 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19187 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19187 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19186 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19186 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19185 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-19185 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-74.el8_8.5 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-74.el8_8.5 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-74.el8_8.5 |
CVE-2021-39537 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2021-39537 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-util-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.90.0-3.el8_8 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-239-74.el8_8.5 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-libs-239-74.el8_8.5 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-pam-239-74.el8_8.5 |
CVE-2018-19211 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2018-19211 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8_8.1 |
CVE-2023-39129 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=cintel-inc/webapps/sftp&tag=0.1&branch=master
More information can be found in the failed pipeline located here: https://repo1.dso.mil/dsop/cintel-inc/webapps/sftp/-/jobs/22527680
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the ~"Hardening::Verification" label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.