UNCLASSIFIED - NO CUI

Skip to content

chore(findings): opensource/jenkins/trmc-jenkins

Summary

opensource/jenkins/trmc-jenkins has 2 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.

Layer: opensource/jenkins/jenkins:2.516.1-lts is EOL, please update if possible

More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/jenkins/trmc-jenkins&tag=2.516.1-lts&branch=master

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.

KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.

id source severity package impact workaround epss_score kev
RHSA-2025:15099 OSCAP Compliance Low N/A N/A
RHSA-2025:15019 OSCAP Compliance Low N/A N/A

More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/jenkins/trmc-jenkins&tag=2.516.1-lts&branch=master

Novel Tidelift Findings (Experimental)

opensource/jenkins/trmc-jenkins has 61 novel Tidelift findings discovered during continuous monitoring.

NOTE: This table is for Iron Bank evaluation and testing purposes. No action required by vendors.

id cvss score package impact workaround epss_score kev
CVE-2018-10237 5.9 com.google.guava:guava-18.0 0.03259 false
CVE-2023-6134 5.4 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.01411 false
CVE-2023-34462 6.5 io.netty:netty-handler-4.1.46.Final Its relatively easy to trigger DoS and make the server suffer from unnecessarily high memory usage by leveraging this vulnerability. You can fork the fixed SniHandler in newer Netty version instead of using the one provided by the old Netty version. Alternatively, you can simply disable SNI by removing SniHandler from your channel pipeline. 0.00563 false
CVE-2024-1722 5.3 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00407 false
CVE-2024-7318 6.3 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00344 false
CVE-2023-3635 7.5 com.squareup.okio:okio-1.17.2 0.00335 false
CVE-2022-4361 10.0 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00311 false
CVE-2025-48924 6.5 commons-lang:commons-lang-2.6 0.00309 false
CVE-2025-48924 6.5 org.apache.commons:commons-lang3-3.13.0 An application or library would need to not only use the API or one of its call sites but also allow for very long inputs for a class name. Alternatively, if the app or library accepts input from the user or a configuration file, the app stack may be vulnerable. 0.00309 false
CVE-2025-48924 6.5 org.apache.commons:commons-lang3-3.14.0 An application or library would need to not only use the API or one of its call sites but also allow for very long inputs for a class name. Alternatively, if the app or library accepts input from the user or a configuration file, the app stack may be vulnerable. 0.00309 false
CVE-2025-48924 6.5 org.apache.commons:commons-lang3-3.17.0 An application or library would need to not only use the API or one of its call sites but also allow for very long inputs for a class name. Alternatively, if the app or library accepts input from the user or a configuration file, the app stack may be vulnerable. 0.00309 false
CVE-2023-6563 7.7 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00304 false
CVE-2023-33201 5.3 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on-1.70 0.00289 false
CVE-2023-33201 5.3 org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on-1.70 0.00289 false
CVE-2024-23076 org.jfree:jfreechart-1.0.19 0.00271 false
CVE-2023-6841 7.5 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00269 false
CVE-2024-47554 4.3 commons-io:commons-io-2.11.0 Either an application is using the class org.apache.commons.io.input.XmlStreamReader or it is not if the class is in use then attackers can craft malicious input to make the application vulnerable if that application accepts input to XmlStreamReader from the world at large. If an application can be relatively certain that its XmlStreamReader input can be trusted, the risk could be lowered from a vulnerability to a bug. An application could mitigate this vulnerability by validating the input given to the class. 0.00266 false
CVE-2024-23077 org.jfree:jfreechart-1.0.19 0.00253 false
CVE-2023-1664 6.5 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00238 false
CVE-2023-6927 6.1 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00213 false
CVE-2024-29857 7.5 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on-1.70 0.00203 false
CVE-2024-29857 7.5 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 0.00203 false
CVE-2021-37533 6.5 commons-net:commons-net-3.6 A malicious server can redirect the Commons Net code to use a different host, but the user has to connect to the malicious server in the first place. 0.00178 false
CVE-2024-34447 5.9 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 0.00167 false
CVE-2024-7260 6.1 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00150 false
CVE-2024-30172 7.5 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on-1.70 0.00136 false
CVE-2024-30172 7.5 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 0.00136 false
CVE-2024-1249 7.4 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00131 false
CVE-2025-25193 5.5 io.netty:netty-common-4.1.79.Final This vulnerability can be triggered only when an attacker already has the write access to the filesystem. In addition, an attacker must create the offending file in the filesystem before the application is started. Therefore, Id say the risk is fairly low. 0.00113 false
CVE-2024-22949 org.jfree:jfreechart-1.0.19 0.00113 false
CVE-2023-2585 3.5 org.keycloak:keycloak-server-spi-private-20.0.3 0.00112 false
CVE-2024-38827 4.8 org.springframework:spring-beans-5.3.25 0.00111 false
CVE-2023-52070 org.jfree:jfreechart-1.0.19 0.00107 false
CVE-2023-0105 6.5 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00088 false
CVE-2023-4918 8.8 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00081 false
CVE-2024-4028 3.8 org.keycloak:keycloak-core-20.0.3 0.00080 false
CVE-2025-52999 8.7 com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core-2.14.1 Vulnerability exposed for many reading cases but not all but depends on databinding level calls, definitions if Java target classes used less likely to be applicable for tree model JsonNode always applicable. 0.00072 false
CVE-2025-52999 8.7 com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core-2.13.4 Vulnerability exposed for many reading cases but not all but depends on databinding level calls, definitions if Java target classes used less likely to be applicable for tree model JsonNode always applicable. 0.00072 false
CVE-2023-3597 5.0 org.keycloak:keycloak-server-spi-private-20.0.3 0.00068 false
CVE-2025-5115 7.5 org.eclipse.jetty.http2:jetty-http2-common-12.0.22 0.00066 false
CVE-2023-33202 5.5 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on-1.70 0.00059 false
CVE-2025-48734 8.8 commons-beanutils:commons-beanutils-1.9.4 An application or library can be vulnerable if it allows inputs or configurations from untrusted sources. 0.00056 false
CVE-2025-8916 6.3 org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk18on-1.77 0.00055 false
CVE-2025-8916 6.3 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 0.00055 false
CVE-2025-8916 6.3 org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on-1.70 0.00055 false
CVE-2025-8885 6.3 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 0.00055 false
CVE-2024-29025 5.3 io.netty:netty-codec-http-4.1.79.Final HttpPostRequestDecoder is vulnerable to this issue regardless of whether it is used as intended or not. If HttpPostRequestDecoder is NOT used for handling file uploads, a user could limit the length of an HTTP POST request body to a small value, which will effectively reduce the theoretically possible maximum number of form fields a request body can contain. However, this workaround might not be feasible if a user needs to handle file uploads, which may not be possible to limit the request both length. 0.00048 false
CVE-2024-30171 5.9 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk15on-1.70 0.00045 false
CVE-2024-30171 5.9 org.bouncycastle:bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 0.00045 false
CVE-2023-2976 7.1 com.google.guava:guava-18.0 0.00042 false
CVE-2023-2976 7.1 com.google.guava:guava-31.1-jre 0.00042 false
CVE-2023-0833 5.5 com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp-3.14.9 0.00036 false
CVE-2025-7962 7.5 org.eclipse.angus:smtp-2.0.3 0.00034 false
CVE-2024-47535 5.5 io.netty:netty-common-4.1.79.Final An attacker must acquire the privilege to override the content of system files such as etcresolv.conf and procsys. Given such powerful superuserlevel privilege, I would imagine the attacker will not waste their time to trigger OOME using this vulnerability. 0.00021 false
CVE-2020-36843 4.3 net.i2p.crypto:eddsa-0.3.0 0.00016 false
CVE-2023-35116 4.7 com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind-2.14.1 0.00015 false
CVE-2023-35116 4.7 com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind-2.13.4.2 0.00015 false
CVE-2020-8908 3.3 com.google.guava:guava-18.0 0.00009 false
CVE-2020-8908 3.3 com.google.guava:guava-31.1-jre 0.00009 false
CVE-2025-58057 6.9 io.netty:netty-codec-4.1.79.Final N/A false
CVE-2025-58056 8.2 io.netty:netty-codec-http-4.1.79.Final N/A false

Tasks

Contributor:

  • Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs)
  • Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback

Iron Bank:

  • Review findings and justifications

Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the Verification label will be removed and the issue will be sent back to Open. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add the Verification label.

Questions?

Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.

Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.

Edited by CHORE_TOKEN
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information