chore(findings): opensource/rustlang/rust
Summary
opensource/rustlang/rust has 144 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
e07d84b039b0e6fcea42fbda1d378647 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | |
addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | |
b18c88ddeab24abfb92ae2ccddb0b022 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | |
CVE-2022-0391 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-45703 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-29941 | Anchore CVE | Medium | llvm-libs-16.0.6-4.el9 |
CVE-2021-35937 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2021-22925 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-26.el9_3.2 |
CVE-2023-25180 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-29942 | Anchore CVE | Medium | llvm-libs-16.0.6-4.el9 |
CVE-2020-19185 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-28320 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-26.el9_3.2 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2022-47695 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-core-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2022-47695 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2021-27212 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openldap-compat-2.6.3-1.el9 |
CVE-2020-35342 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-3446 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2020-19188 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-28320 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-minimal-7.76.1-26.el9_3.2 |
CVE-2022-48064 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-48554 | Anchore CVE | Low | file-libs-5.39-14.el9 |
CVE-2022-47696 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-35939 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-sign-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2023-39615 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-4.el9 |
CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2022-35206 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-3572 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-pip-wheel-21.2.3-7.el9 |
CVE-2020-21490 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2022-48065 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-4039 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libstdc++-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2022-48565 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2020-19188 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2021-35938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2023-5156 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2021-46174 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2022-47673 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-25587 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-22925 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-26.el9_3.2 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libblkid-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2023-3446 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2022-45703 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-5156 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2021-35937 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2021-23840 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2021-32256 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-5363 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2021-35938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2022-48566 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2021-35937 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-build-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2020-19190 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2021-35937 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rpm-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2021-35939 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-build-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2021-20197 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47007 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-2953 | Anchore CVE | Low | openldap-compat-2.6.3-1.el9 |
CVE-2023-5363 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2023-2953 | Anchore CVE | Low | openldap-2.6.3-1.el9 |
CVE-2023-25587 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-4039 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcc-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2021-23840 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2022-44840 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-48565 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-47696 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2022-0391 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-48063 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-5156 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2022-48063 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2020-19190 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libfdisk-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2022-48064 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2021-35939 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2022-48566 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2020-19724 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2020-19186 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-29934 | Anchore CVE | Medium | llvm-libs-16.0.6-4.el9 |
CVE-2021-35937 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-sign-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2023-45853 | Anchore CVE | Medium | zlib-1.2.11-40.el9 |
CVE-2023-3817 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2021-35938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-build-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libmount-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2020-19726 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2021-35938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rpm-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2022-47007 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libsmartcols-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2022-35206 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2021-23336 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2021-27212 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openldap-2.6.3-1.el9 |
CVE-2020-19724 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libuuid-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2023-5156 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2021-35939 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rpm-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2021-35938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-sign-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2020-19187 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-26924 | Anchore CVE | Low | llvm-libs-16.0.6-4.el9 |
CVE-2021-23336 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3 |
CVE-2020-19186 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2022-47008 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47011 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2021-20197 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-24593 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-11.el9 |
CVE-2022-48065 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2020-21490 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-35939 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2021-35938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2020-35342 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-2975 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2023-2222 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-3817 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2022-35205 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-46174 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-29383 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-2.37.4-15.el9 |
CVE-2020-19187 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2021-35939 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2020-19726 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47010 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-0687 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-83.el9_3.7 |
CVE-2021-44568 | Anchore CVE | Low | libsolv-0.7.24-2.el9 |
CVE-2022-47011 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-2222 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-2975 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2023-29935 | Anchore CVE | Medium | llvm-libs-16.0.6-4.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2020-19185 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2022-47010 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2022-47673 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2023-29933 | Anchore CVE | Medium | llvm-libs-16.0.6-4.el9 |
CVE-2021-35937 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rpm-libs-4.16.1.3-25.el9 |
CVE-2023-5678 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2023-5678 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-24.el9 |
CVE-2023-37920 | Anchore CVE | Low | ca-certificates-2023.2.60_v7.0.306-90.1.el9_2 |
CVE-2022-44840 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-10.2-11.el9 |
CVE-2018-25091 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-urllib3-1.26.5-3.el9 |
CVE-2023-45803 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-urllib3-1.26.5-3.el9 |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/rustlang/rust&tag=1.71.1&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.