chore(findings): raven-solutions/experience-manager-website
Summary
raven-solutions/experience-manager-website has 113 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-27293 | Anchore CVE | High | RestSharp-106.11.7 |
CVE-2021-32840 | Anchore CVE | Critical | SharpZipLib-1.3.1 |
CVE-2021-32841 | Anchore CVE | Medium | SharpZipLib-1.3.1 |
CVE-2021-32842 | Anchore CVE | Medium | SharpZipLib-1.3.1 |
CVE-2022-36227 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-4.el8 |
CVE-2022-36227 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-4.el8 |
CVE-2020-17049 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-libs-1.18.2-22.el8_7 |
CCE-86099-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2019-19244 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-17.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-libs-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-common-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-tools-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-daemon-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2018-1000654 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-4.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-9937 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-17.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-9936 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-17.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | |
CVE-2023-22745 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tpm2-tss-2.3.2-4.el8 |
CVE-2023-22745 | Anchore CVE | Low | tpm2-tss-2.3.2-4.el8 |
CCE-83478-8 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-83480-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-86067-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-pam-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-libs-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2021-20193 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-6.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2019-9923 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-6.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-26604 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2023-26604 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2023-26604 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-25881 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-0613 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-0536 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-24723 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.79.0-11.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.79.0-11.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-util-3.79.0-11.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.79.0-11.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.79.0-11.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-4231 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-26604 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2023-26604 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2023-26604 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2022-23990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-10.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-27535 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27535 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-4899 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 |
CVE-2023-27536 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27536 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2022-4899 | Anchore CVE | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 |
CVE-2023-27536 | Anchore CVE | Medium | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27535 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27535 | Anchore CVE | Medium | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-27536 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.3 |
CVE-2023-1579 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25180 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-159.el8 |
CVE-2023-24593 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-159.el8 |
CVE-2023-0464 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0464 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-1579 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-0466 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0466 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0465 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0465 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-9.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-4209 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-6.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-45985 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | lua-libs-5.3.4-12.el8 |
PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-9.0.3 |
CVE-2021-33503 | Twistlock CVE | High | urllib3-1.24.2 |
CVE-2019-20916 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-9.0.3 |
CVE-2020-26137 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.24.2 |
CVE-2019-11236 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.24.2 |
CVE-2023-29469 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-29469 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-28484 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-28484 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2022-40897 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | setuptools-39.2.0 |
CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | pip-9.0.3 |
CVE-2023-28260 | Anchore CVE | High | dotnet-host-7.0.4-1.el8_7 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=raven-solutions/experience-manager-website&tag=1.0.0&branch=master
More information can be found in the failed pipeline located here: https://repo1.dso.mil/dsop/raven-solutions/experience-manager-website/-/jobs/14743840
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the ~"Hardening::Approval" label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications -
Send approval request to Authorizing Official -
Close issue after approval from Authorizing Official
Note: If the above approval process is rejected for any reason, the
Approval
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theApproval
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.