chore(findings): redhat/ubi/ubi8
Summary
redhat/ubi/ubi8 has 78 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=redhat/ubi/ubi8&tag=8.10&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-2650 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.91907 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.03769 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00857 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00690 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00685 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9923 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00541 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00398 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00245 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00219 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14087 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.56.4-167.el8_10 | 0.00197 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14087 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.56.4-167.el8_10 | 0.00197 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00123 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8905 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | file-5.33-27.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8905 | Anchore CVE | Medium | file-libs-5.33-27.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8906 | Twistlock CVE | Low | file-5.33-27.el8_10 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8906 | Anchore CVE | Low | file-libs-5.33-27.el8_10 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8277 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8277 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-config-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8277 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20193 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00069 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-45582 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00040 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14512 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.56.4-167.el8_10 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14512 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.56.4-167.el8_10 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00030 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00030 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00030 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9230 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9230 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11840 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11840 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11495 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11495 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11494 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11494 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11414 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11414 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11413 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11412 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11412 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66382 | Twistlock CVE | Low | expat-2.5.0-1.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66382 | Anchore CVE | Low | expat-2.5.0-1.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13601 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.56.4-167.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13601 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.56.4-167.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | util-linux-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libfdisk-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libuuid-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libblkid-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libsmartcols-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libmount-2.32.1-46.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11839 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11839 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-config-0.9.6-16.el8_10 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-62813 | Anchore CVE | Low | lz4-libs-1.8.3-5.el8_10 | N/A | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52099 | Anchore CVE | Medium | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | N/A | false |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=redhat/ubi/ubi8&tag=8.10&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Apply the StatusReview label to this issue for a merge request reviewand wait for feedback
OR
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue for a VAT justifications reviewand wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
RevieworVerificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toTo-Do. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theRevieworVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN