UBI9 and UBI9-micro 9.x tagging strategy
Would it make sense to tag UBI9
full with the same 9
tag as ubi9-micro
in a way that would allow both to align?
My use case would be during a multi stage build that could build on redhat/ubi/ubi9:9
> redhat/ubi/ubi9-micro:9
I would say the same could apply to ubi10
also
This probably has an impact on VAT inheritance as well.
Edited by pbev