chore(findings): rocketchat/ddp-streamer-service
Summary
rocketchat/ddp-streamer-service has 362 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: opensource/nodejs/nodejs14:14.21.3 is EOL, please update if possible
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi8:8.8 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=rocketchat/ddp-streamer-service&tag=7.0.0&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-44487 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.94437 | true | ||
| CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-2650 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27983 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.66457 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19188 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.07066 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19186 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19185 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04961 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19190 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04954 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19187 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04834 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9936 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03924 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9936 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03924 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9937 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03622 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9937 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03622 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-23990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-17.el8_10 | 0.03519 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-23990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-17.el8_10 | 0.03519 | false | ||
| CVE-2005-2541 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.03250 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-29415 | Twistlock CVE | High | ip-2.0.0 | 0.02845 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-29415 | Twistlock CVE | High | ip-1.1.5 | 0.02845 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.6-22.el8 | 0.02806 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02620 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02620 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19189 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02620 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.02537 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.02537 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000880 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01747 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000880 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01747 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16866 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16866 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16866 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9674 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9674 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000879 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01112 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000879 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01112 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-46809 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00989 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-21674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00915 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-21674 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00915 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12905 | Twistlock CVE | High | tar-fs-2.1.1 | Really depends on use. Most uses of tarfs use the packaging aspect. Normally if you use the extracting aspect you are also considering things like file limits already. | patches exist for all major release lines. if still unable to update, use a sandboxed directory or switch to tarstream to parse it yourself. | 0.00776 | false |
| CVE-2024-12905 | Twistlock CVE | High | tar-fs-3.0.6 | Really depends on use. Most uses of tarfs use the packaging aspect. Normally if you use the extracting aspect you are also considering things like file limits already. | patches exist for all major release lines. if still unable to update, use a sandboxed directory or switch to tarstream to parse it yourself. | 0.00776 | false |
| CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-cloud-what-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | dnf-plugin-subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-syspurpose-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-subscription-manager-rhsm-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9923 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00408 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9923 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00408 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00404 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00404 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-42282 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | ip-2.0.0 | 0.00397 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-42282 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | ip-1.1.5 | 0.00397 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22025 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-14.21.3 | 0.00343 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-39537 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00342 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00338 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2236 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00301 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2236 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00301 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-12904 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00290 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19211 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19211 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19211 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-19244 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00256 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-19244 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00256 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21892 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00255 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-26920 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | fast-xml-parser-4.0.11 | If the XML source is untrusted or usersupplied, the parsed result is used in a way where polluted prototypes affect logic. | Manually validate tag names before using parsed objects. Use a custom tagvalue processor to sanitize XML tag names, ensuring they do not include prototypemodifying keys like proto, constructor, or prototype. Avoid merging parsed objects with applicationlevel objects or configurations. | 0.00226 | false |
| CVE-2025-1153 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00212 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1153 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00212 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28863 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-6.1.11 | 0.00205 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28863 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-4.4.19 | 0.00205 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-34104 | Twistlock CVE | High | fast-xml-parser-4.0.11 | 0.00196 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-25881 | Twistlock CVE | High | http-cache-semantics-4.1.0 | 0.00193 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27534 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27534 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20657 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20657 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27982 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-14.21.3 | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-4209 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00148 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-4209 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00148 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-38552 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00137 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00136 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00136 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21538 | Twistlock CVE | High | cross-spawn-5.1.0 | 0.00129 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00127 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-14250 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00127 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-14250 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00127 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-29499 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-29499 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000654 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-5.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000654 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-5.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-11.el8_8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48387 | Twistlock CVE | High | tar-fs-2.1.1 | If you are extracting untrusted tarballs you are affected and should upgrade. | Patch releases out for ALL release lines, so just update to latest patch, likely your npm already does this, you might need to bump your lock file if you use that. | 0.00110 | false |
| CVE-2025-48387 | Twistlock CVE | High | tar-fs-3.0.6 | If you are extracting untrusted tarballs you are affected and should upgrade. | Patch releases out for ALL release lines, so just update to latest patch, likely your npm already does this, you might need to bump your lock file if you use that. | 0.00110 | false |
| CVE-2024-22019 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00110 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-14.21.3 | 0.00107 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8905 | Anchore CVE | Medium | file-libs-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00105 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8905 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | file-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00105 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20193 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20193 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39333 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-14.21.3 | 0.00094 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-23166 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00092 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8906 | Anchore CVE | Low | file-libs-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8906 | Twistlock CVE | Low | file-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-4899 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-4899 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | zstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-23085 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-14.21.3 | 0.00082 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32006 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-23165 | Anchore CVE | Low | node-14.21.3 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-24032 | Anchore CVE | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00062 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-24032 | Twistlock CVE | Low | zstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00062 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-10.32-3.el8_6 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pcre2-10.32-3.el8_6 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32665 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32665 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5318 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7039 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5372 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5372 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5372 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-35195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00044 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-45582 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-45582 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32559 | Anchore CVE | High | node-14.21.3 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32611 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32611 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-4156 | Anchore CVE | Low | gawk-4.2.1-4.el8 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32002 | Anchore CVE | Critical | node-14.21.3 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8941 | Anchore CVE | High | pam-1.3.1-38.el8_10 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7783 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | form-data-2.3.3 | See the impact section in the attached GHSA. | 0.00024 | false | |
| CVE-2024-57360 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5889 | Twistlock CVE | Low | brace-expansion-1.1.11 | Im mirroring the CVE severity assessment here. | Sanitize strings being passed to the function so that they dont contain many , in a row. | 0.00022 | false |
| CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-54798 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tmp-0.0.33 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.30-15.el8 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.30-15.el8 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30258 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30258 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-tools-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-daemon-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-common-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-libs-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-25724 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-25724 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.24.2 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00015 | false |
| CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-23167 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-14.21.3 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57970 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57970 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-3219 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | elfutils-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9714 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | N/A | false | ||
| addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| GHSA-x3cc-x39p-42qx | Anchore CVE | Medium | fast-xml-parser-4.0.11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw | Anchore CVE | Low | brace-expansion-1.1.11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw | Anchore CVE | Low | brace-expansion-1.1.11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-rc47-6667-2j5j | Anchore CVE | High | http-cache-semantics-4.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-pq67-2wwv-3xjx | Anchore CVE | High | tar-fs-2.1.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-pq67-2wwv-3xjx | Anchore CVE | High | tar-fs-3.0.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 | Anchore CVE | Critical | form-data-2.3.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-f5x3-32g6-xq36 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-4.4.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-f5x3-32g6-xq36 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-6.1.11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-8cj5-5rvv-wf4v | Anchore CVE | High | tar-fs-3.0.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-8cj5-5rvv-wf4v | Anchore CVE | High | tar-fs-2.1.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-78xj-cgh5-2h22 | Anchore CVE | Low | ip-2.0.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-78xj-cgh5-2h22 | Anchore CVE | Low | ip-1.1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-52f5-9888-hmc6 | Anchore CVE | Low | tmp-0.0.33 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-3xgq-45jj-v275 | Anchore CVE | High | cross-spawn-5.1.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-2p57-rm9w-gvfp | Anchore CVE | High | ip-2.0.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-2p57-rm9w-gvfp | Anchore CVE | High | ip-1.1.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| CCE-89707-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-86473-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-86106-2 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85902-5 | OSCAP Compliance | High | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85899-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85897-7 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85870-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-84255-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-84254-2 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-82730-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-81044-0 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80854-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80853-5 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80852-7 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80851-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80839-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80838-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80837-8 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80664-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| 554f00250994e8f927cbc5c31b77a931 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=rocketchat/ddp-streamer-service&tag=7.0.0&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN