chore(findings): security-compass/sd-elements/mod_wsgi
Summary
security-compass/sd-elements/mod_wsgi has 183 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.6 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=security-compass/sd-elements/mod_wsgi&tag=2025.3.8-9.6-001&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00690 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00690 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00690 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53020 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00315 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-42516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00277 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43204 | Anchore CVE | Medium | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14087 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-18.el9_7 | 0.00197 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14087 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-18.el9_7 | 0.00197 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-devel-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2017-1000383 | Twistlock CVE | Low | emacs-1:27.2-18.el9 | 0.00142 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00128 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00123 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00123 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00123 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-devel-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-47038 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | perl-0:5.32.1-481.1.el9_6 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Twistlock CVE | High | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Anchore CVE | High | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55753 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00085 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Twistlock CVE | High | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Anchore CVE | High | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58098 | Anchore CVE | High | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.23-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-devel-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.23-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.23-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66019 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | pypdf-6.3.0 | 0.00060 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11731 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11731 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64460 | Twistlock CVE | Low | django-4.2.26 | 0.00049 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66293 | Twistlock CVE | High | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66293 | Anchore CVE | High | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-tools-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-filesystem-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-devel-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Anchore CVE | Medium | httpd-core-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66200 | Anchore CVE | Medium | mod_lua-2.4.62-7.el9 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14512 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-18.el9_7 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14512 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-18.el9_7 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64720 | Twistlock CVE | High | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64720 | Anchore CVE | High | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9232 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9232 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9232 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11081 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11081 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11083 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11083 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11083 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-devel-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11840 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11840 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11840 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11495 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11495 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11495 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11494 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11494 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11494 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11414 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11414 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11414 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11413 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11413 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11412 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11412 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11412 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11082 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11082 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6176 | Twistlock CVE | High | brotli-1.0.9-7.el9_5 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6176 | Anchore CVE | High | libbrotli-1.0.9-7.el9_5 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66471 | Twistlock CVE | High | urllib3-1.26.5 | As of 20251212, we have received no reports of active exploitation in the wild. Users would need to stream compressed content from untrusted sources. | 0.00018 | false | |
| CVE-2025-66471 | Twistlock CVE | High | urllib3-1.26.19 | As of 20251212, we have received no reports of active exploitation in the wild. Users would need to stream compressed content from untrusted sources. | 0.00018 | false | |
| CVE-2025-66418 | Twistlock CVE | High | urllib3-1.26.19 | As of 20251212, we have received no reports of active exploitation in the wild. Users would need to make requests to untrusted sources. | Use preloadcontentFalse and ensure that resp.headerscontentencoding contains a safe number of encodings before reading the response content. | 0.00018 | false |
| CVE-2025-66418 | Twistlock CVE | High | urllib3-1.26.5 | As of 20251212, we have received no reports of active exploitation in the wild. Users would need to make requests to untrusted sources. | Use preloadcontentFalse and ensure that resp.headerscontentencoding contains a safe number of encodings before reading the response content. | 0.00018 | false |
| CVE-2025-65018 | Twistlock CVE | High | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65018 | Anchore CVE | High | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.23-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-devel-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.23-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.23-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66382 | Twistlock CVE | Low | expat-2.5.0-5.el9_7.1 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66382 | Anchore CVE | Low | expat-devel-2.5.0-5.el9_7.1 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66382 | Anchore CVE | Low | expat-2.5.0-5.el9_7.1 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.12-devel-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-10911 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-10911 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13601 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-18.el9_7 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13601 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-18.el9_7 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | util-linux-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libfdisk-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libsmartcols-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-core-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libuuid-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libmount-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libblkid-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11839 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11839 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11839 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-67.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64506 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64506 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64505 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64505 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-61985 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-46.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-61985 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-46.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-61985 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-clients-8.7p1-46.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | git-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | git-core-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | perl-Git-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | git-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | git-core-doc-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-23050 | Twistlock CVE | Low | qt5-5.15.9-1.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-23050 | Anchore CVE | Low | qt5-srpm-macros-5.15.9-1.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-40909 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | perl-0:5.32.1-481.1.el9_6 | 0.00009 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13372 | Twistlock CVE | Low | django-4.2.26 | 0.00008 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-61984 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-46.el9 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-61984 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-46.el9 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-61984 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-clients-8.7p1-46.el9 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| GHSA-vrcr-9hj9-jcg6 | Anchore CVE | Medium | django-4.2.26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-rqw2-ghq9-44m7 | Anchore CVE | Medium | django-4.2.26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-m449-cwjh-6pw7 | Anchore CVE | Medium | pypdf-6.3.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-gm62-xv2j-4w53 | Anchore CVE | High | urllib3-1.26.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-2xpw-w6gg-jr37 | Anchore CVE | High | urllib3-1.26.19 | N/A | N/A | ||
| 7f111fe3136012040dcd65f2dd8d55aa | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=security-compass/sd-elements/mod_wsgi&tag=2025.3.8-9.6-001&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Apply the StatusReview label to this issue for a merge request reviewand wait for feedback
OR
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue for a VAT justifications reviewand wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
RevieworVerificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toTo-Do. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theRevieworVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN