chore(findings): soacloud/custom-artemis-init
Summary
soacloud/custom-artemis-init has 121 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=soacloud/custom-artemis-init&tag=0.1.2&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-16232 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.01738 | false | ||
| CVE-2017-17973 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00486 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6787 | Twistlock CVE | High | org.keycloak_keycloak-core-18.0.2 | 0.00423 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6277 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00418 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6277 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00418 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27427 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | org.apache.activemq_artemis-jms-client-2.33.0 | 0.00271 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-25434 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00209 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-25434 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00209 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00163 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8291 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58457 | Twistlock CVE | Low | org.apache.zookeeper_zookeeper-3.9.1 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58457 | Anchore CVE | Medium | zookeeper-jute-3.9.1 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8916 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | org.bouncycastle_bcpkix-jdk15on-1.70.00.0 | 0.00087 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8916 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | org.bouncycastle_bcpkix-jdk18on-1.77.00.0 | 0.00087 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8885 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | org.bouncycastle_bcprov-jdk18on-1.77.00.0 | 0.00082 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47808 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.22.12-4.el9 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47808 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.22.12-4.el9 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-1056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00074 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-1056 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00074 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27391 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | org.apache.activemq_artemis-jms-client-2.33.0 | 0.00073 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9901 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libsoup-2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 | 0.00068 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9901 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libsoup-2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 | 0.00068 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13836 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47806 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.22.12-4.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47806 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.22.12-4.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-43228 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | webkit2gtk3-2.50.3-1.el9_7 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-43228 | Anchore CVE | Medium | webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.50.3-1.el9_7 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11731 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-11731 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52886 | Anchore CVE | Medium | poppler-glib-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00051 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52886 | Anchore CVE | Medium | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00051 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52886 | Anchore CVE | Medium | poppler-data-0.4.9-9.el9 | 0.00051 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52886 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | poppler-data-0.4.9-9.el9 | 0.00051 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52886 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00051 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50952 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openjpeg2-2.4.0-8.el9 | 0.00049 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50952 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openjpeg2-2.4.0-8.el9 | 0.00049 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-43419 | Twistlock CVE | High | webkit2gtk3-2.50.3-1.el9_7 | 0.00049 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-43419 | Anchore CVE | High | webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.50.3-1.el9_7 | 0.00049 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-66293 | Anchore CVE | High | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.17.0.10-1.el9 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13978 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13978 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8961 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8961 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58057 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | io.netty_netty-codec-4.1.107.Final | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64720 | Anchore CVE | High | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.17.0.10-1.el9 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-25435 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-25435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52999 | Twistlock CVE | High | com.fasterxml.jackson.core_jackson-core-2.14.2 | 0.00030 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9165 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8851 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8851 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14523 | Twistlock CVE | High | libsoup-2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14523 | Anchore CVE | High | libsoup-2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9232 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.5.1-4.el9_7 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-37052 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-25433 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-25433 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00026 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-58056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | io.netty_netty-codec-http-4.1.107.Final | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50422 | Anchore CVE | Low | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50422 | Anchore CVE | Low | poppler-glib-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50422 | Twistlock CVE | Low | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47807 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.22.12-4.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47807 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.22.12-4.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52885 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52885 | Anchore CVE | Medium | poppler-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-52885 | Anchore CVE | Medium | poppler-glib-21.01.0-21.el9 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-65018 | Anchore CVE | High | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.17.0.10-1.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-54080 | Anchore CVE | Low | exiv2-0.27.5-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-54080 | Anchore CVE | Low | exiv2-libs-0.27.5-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-54080 | Twistlock CVE | Low | exiv2-0.27.5-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-13837 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.12-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6075 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.12-libs-3.12.11-2.el9 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-1916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-1916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-10911 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-10911 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48924 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | org.apache.commons_commons-lang3-3.14.0 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libfdisk-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-14104 | Anchore CVE | Medium | util-linux-core-2.37.4-21.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.193-1.el9 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64506 | Anchore CVE | Medium | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.17.0.10-1.el9 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-64505 | Anchore CVE | Medium | java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.17.0.10-1.el9 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-3164 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00010 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-3164 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-15.el9_7.2 | 0.00010 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55304 | Anchore CVE | Low | exiv2-libs-0.27.5-2.el9 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55304 | Anchore CVE | Low | exiv2-0.27.5-2.el9 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-55304 | Twistlock CVE | Low | exiv2-0.27.5-2.el9 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8197 | Anchore CVE | Low | libsoup-2.72.0-12.el9_7.1 | N/A | false | ||
| GHSA-j288-q9x7-2f5v | Anchore CVE | Medium | commons-lang3-3.14.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-j288-q9x7-2f5v | Anchore CVE | Medium | commons-lang3-3.14.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-h46c-h94j-95f3 | Anchore CVE | High | jackson-core-2.14.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-g93m-8x6h-g5gv | Anchore CVE | High | zookeeper-3.9.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-fghv-69vj-qj49 | Anchore CVE | Low | netty-codec-http-4.1.107.Final | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-fghv-69vj-qj49 | Anchore CVE | Low | netty-codec-http-4.1.107.Final | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-67mf-3cr5-8w23 | Anchore CVE | Medium | bcprov-jdk18on-1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-4cx2-fc23-5wg6 | Anchore CVE | Medium | bcpkix-jdk15on-1.70 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-4cx2-fc23-5wg6 | Anchore CVE | Medium | bcpkix-jdk18on-1.77 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-3p8m-j85q-pgmj | Anchore CVE | Medium | netty-codec-4.1.107.Final | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-3p8m-j85q-pgmj | Anchore CVE | Medium | netty-codec-4.1.107.Final | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-2hmj-97jw-28jh | Anchore CVE | Medium | zookeeper-3.9.1 | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=soacloud/custom-artemis-init&tag=0.1.2&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Apply the StatusReview label to this issue for a merge request reviewand wait for feedback
OR
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue for a VAT justifications reviewand wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
RevieworVerificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toTo-Do. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theRevieworVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN