chore(findings): technergetics/anubis-schema-registry
Summary
technergetics/anubis-schema-registry has 667 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi8:8.8 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=technergetics/anubis-schema-registry&tag=5.5.1&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.88208 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21512 | Twistlock CVE | High | mysql2-1.7.0 | 0.68341 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27983 | Anchore CVE | High | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.65466 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27983 | Anchore CVE | High | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.65466 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27983 | Anchore CVE | High | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.65466 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27983 | Anchore CVE | High | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.65466 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21508 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | mysql2-1.7.0 | 0.55588 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.22062 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.22062 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.22062 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.22062 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14343 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.13704 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14343 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.13704 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14343 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.13704 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14343 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.13704 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14343 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.13704 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9740 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.10210 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9740 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.10210 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9636 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.09135 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9636 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.09135 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.07682 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.07682 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.07682 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.07682 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.07682 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.07100 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.07100 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.07100 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-26136 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | tough-cookie-2.5.0 | 0.06872 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19188 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.06348 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32681 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.06121 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32681 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.06121 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19187 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04825 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19186 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04825 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19185 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04825 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19190 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.04818 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.04101 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9936 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03718 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9936 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03718 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-48565 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.03703 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-48565 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.03703 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-23990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-17.el8_10 | 0.03519 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-23990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | expat-2.2.5-17.el8_10 | 0.03519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.6-22.el8 | 0.03253 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9937 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03244 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9937 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.03244 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-43818 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.03013 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-43818 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.03013 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-1747 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.02593 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-1747 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.02593 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-1747 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.02593 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-1747 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-six-1.11.0-8.el8 | 0.02593 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-1747 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.02593 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-1747 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.02593 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02546 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19189 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02546 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-19189 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.02546 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.02537 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.02537 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-29921 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.02447 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-29921 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.02447 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-29921 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.02447 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-29921 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.02447 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-29921 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.02447 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-8492 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.02413 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-8492 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.02413 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-8492 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-six-1.11.0-8.el8 | 0.02413 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-8492 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.02413 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-8492 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.02413 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-8492 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.02413 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-27291 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.02326 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-27291 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.02326 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2511 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.02116 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-7164 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01979 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-7164 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01979 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000880 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01747 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000880 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01747 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01519 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-11324 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01449 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-11324 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01449 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.01333 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24329 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01309 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24329 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01309 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16866 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16866 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16866 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.01248 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9674 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9674 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.01198 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9948 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01118 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9948 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01118 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000879 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01112 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000879 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.01112 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-7548 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01109 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-7548 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01109 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20852 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01052 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20852 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01052 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9947 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01045 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9947 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01045 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-27783 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.01026 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-27783 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.01026 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-46809 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00989 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-46809 | Anchore CVE | Medium | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00989 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-46809 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00989 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-46809 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00989 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14422 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-six-1.11.0-8.el8 | 0.00973 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14422 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00973 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14422 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00973 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14422 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00973 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14422 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00973 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-14422 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00973 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-26144 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | graphql-16.7.1 | Only servers that validate untrusted graphql queries are affected. | 0.00966 | false | |
| CVE-2020-21674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00915 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-21674 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00915 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-29244 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00899 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-29244 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00899 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-29244 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00899 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-29244 | Anchore CVE | Medium | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00899 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-27619 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00896 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-27619 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00896 | false | ||
| CVE-2015-20107 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00888 | false | ||
| CVE-2015-20107 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00888 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33503 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00863 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33503 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00863 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33503 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00863 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33503 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00863 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33503 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00863 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0391 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00816 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0391 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00816 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0391 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00816 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0391 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00816 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0391 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00816 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00801 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16056 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00793 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16056 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00793 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-23931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00717 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-23931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00717 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-23931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00717 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-23931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00717 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-23931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00717 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00668 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-11236 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00636 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-11236 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00636 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20916 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00622 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20916 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00622 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-43646 | Twistlock CVE | High | get-func-name-2.0.0 | 0.00616 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11831 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | serialize-javascript-6.0.1 | 0.00597 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21509 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | mysql2-1.7.0 | 0.00585 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-26116 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00579 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-26116 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00579 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16935 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00565 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-16935 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00565 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-37890 | Twistlock CVE | High | ws-7.5.9 | 0.00541 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-cloud-what-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-subscription-manager-rhsm-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | dnf-plugin-subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-syspurpose-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-0235 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.44-1.el8_10 | 0.00512 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00508 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45590 | Twistlock CVE | High | body-parser-1.20.0 | A malicious actor using a specially crafted payload could flood the server with a large number of requests, resulting in denial of service. More technical details can be found at httpsexpressjs.com20241022securityauditmilestoneachievement.html | 0.00504 | false | |
| CVE-2024-45590 | Twistlock CVE | High | body-parser-1.20.1 | A malicious actor using a specially crafted payload could flood the server with a large number of requests, resulting in denial of service. More technical details can be found at httpsexpressjs.com20241022securityauditmilestoneachievement.html | 0.00504 | false | |
| CVE-2021-28957 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00491 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-28957 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00491 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-43804 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00472 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-43804 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00472 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-48631 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | @adobe/css-tools-4.2.0 | 0.00468 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20477 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00456 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20477 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00456 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20477 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00456 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20477 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00456 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20477 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-six-1.11.0-8.el8 | 0.00456 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20477 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00456 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20060 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00442 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20060 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00442 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-23336 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00414 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-23336 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00414 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-39537 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00409 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9923 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00408 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-9923 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00408 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20907 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00407 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-20907 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00407 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00404 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19217 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00404 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20066 | Twistlock CVE | Low | jsdom-16.7.0 | 0.00402 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3733 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00366 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3733 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00366 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-4189 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-4189 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00361 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-10735 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00353 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-10735 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00353 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-10735 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00353 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-10735 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00353 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-10735 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00353 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22025 | Anchore CVE | Medium | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00343 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22025 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00343 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22025 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00343 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22025 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00343 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21507 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | mysql2-1.7.0 | 0.00341 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00338 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00338 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00338 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00338 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-3651 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00338 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00337 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00332 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-40897 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00318 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-40897 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00318 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2236 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00301 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-2236 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00301 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-12904 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgcrypt-1.8.5-7.el8_6 | 0.00290 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19211 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19211 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-19211 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00278 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-40217 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-40217 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-2255 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-2255 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-2255 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-2255 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-2255 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00266 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-19244 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00256 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-19244 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00256 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-26137 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00245 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-26137 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00245 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00226 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4068 | Twistlock CVE | High | braces-3.0.2 | 0.00225 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-29180 | Twistlock CVE | High | webpack-dev-middleware-5.3.3 | 0.00218 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-18074 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00215 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-18074 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00215 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1153 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00212 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1153 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00212 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-28493 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00207 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-28493 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00207 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-28863 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-6.1.11 | 0.00205 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00184 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43788 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | webpack-5.88.2 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27534 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27534 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27534 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-34.el8_10.3 | 0.00176 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20657 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-20657 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00173 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00173 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00173 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00173 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00173 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27982 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27982 | Anchore CVE | Medium | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27982 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-27982 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-4209 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-4209 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00172 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-26364 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | @adobe/css-tools-4.2.0 | 0.00168 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45296 | Twistlock CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | Its unlikely you are using routes that match the required characteristics, overwhelming majority of user paths stick with foobar or foo.bar. | Provide a manual regular expression to the second parameter that does not match the prefixed text. | 0.00167 | false |
| CVE-2024-45296 | Twistlock CVE | High | path-to-regexp-1.8.0 | Its unlikely you are using routes that match the required characteristics, overwhelming majority of user paths stick with foobar or foo.bar. | Provide a manual regular expression to the second parameter that does not match the prefixed text. | 0.00167 | false |
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00157 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00157 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00157 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00157 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00157 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00153 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00151 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-14250 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00151 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-14250 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00151 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3737 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00138 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3737 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00138 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-38552 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00137 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-38552 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00137 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-38552 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00137 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-38552 | Anchore CVE | Medium | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00137 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00136 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00136 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-42771 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00130 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-42771 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00130 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00129 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00129 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00129 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21538 | Twistlock CVE | High | cross-spawn-7.0.3 | 0.00129 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21538 | Twistlock CVE | High | cross-spawn-4.0.2 | 0.00129 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4067 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | micromatch-4.0.5 | 0.00126 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-29499 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-29499 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.112.0-4.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000654 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-5.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2018-1000654 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-5.el8_10 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20270 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00115 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20270 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00115 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-48560 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00114 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-48560 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00114 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3426 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3426 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3426 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3426 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3426 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00113 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-18874 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-18874 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-18874 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-18874 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-18874 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00112 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-44270 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | postcss-8.4.27 | Most of users use PostCSS locally as build tool. Even people who process users CSS via PostCSS rarely do security linting of CSS. | Remove all r before parsing CSS | 0.00109 | false |
| CVE-2019-8905 | Anchore CVE | Medium | file-libs-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00105 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8905 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | file-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00105 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20193 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-20193 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00100 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9288 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | sha.js-2.4.11 | See above. | Check the types of the input before passing it in to the hashing function. | 0.00094 | false |
| CVE-2023-39333 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00094 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39333 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00094 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39333 | Anchore CVE | Low | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00094 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39333 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00094 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-22195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00091 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8906 | Anchore CVE | Low | file-libs-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2019-8906 | Twistlock CVE | Low | file-5.33-26.el8 | 0.00090 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-45061 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-45061 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-4899 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-4899 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | zstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00086 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-1.1.1k-14.el8_6 | 0.00080 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45143 | Anchore CVE | Low | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00078 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45143 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00078 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45143 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00078 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45143 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00078 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00076 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21511 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | mysql2-1.7.0 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47764 | Twistlock CVE | Low | cookie-0.5.0 | 0.00069 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-52798 | Twistlock CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | 0.00067 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45133 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | @babel/traverse-7.22.8 | Users will not be affected if they use only official Babel plugins. For thirdparty Babel plugins, please review the source code and make sure they do not use the path.evaluateor path.evaluateTruthy method. | 0.00067 | false | |
| CVE-2025-7039 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00066 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43799 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | send-0.18.0 | Application owners have always been expected to sanitize and validate their inputs, so using it correctly should result in very low likelihood of impact. | Validate and sanitize user inputs. | 0.00063 | false |
| CVE-2021-24032 | Anchore CVE | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00062 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-24032 | Twistlock CVE | Low | zstd-1.4.4-1.el8 | 0.00062 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-10.32-3.el8_6 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pcre2-10.32-3.el8_6 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32665 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32665 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43796 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | express-4.18.1 | A successful exploitation of this vector requires the following1. The attacker MUST control the input to response.redirect2. express MUST NOT redirect before the template appears3. the browser MUST NOT complete redirection before4. the user MUST click on the link in the templateNote this exploitation requires a lot of work from the attacker, also the victim should use the links generated in the template, this require certain conditions browser rules, network, etc.... More details httpsgithub.comexpressjsexpresssecurityadvisoriesGHSAqw6hvgh9j6wx | Users are encouraged to upgrade to the patched version of express, but otherwise can workaround this issue by making sure any untrusted inputs are safe, ideally by validating them against an explicit allowlist | 0.00058 | false |
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5372 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5372 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5372 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-8.el8_10.3 | 0.00056 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43800 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | serve-static-1.15.0 | Users who are already validating and sanitizing their inputs as expected are highly unlikely to be impacted. | Validate and sanitize user input before passing it to this method. | 0.00056 | false |
| CVE-2025-5318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5318 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5987 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27789 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | @babel/runtime-7.22.6 | Its only if you are passing untrusted inputs to the second argument of RegExp.prototype.replace, which is a rare thing to do | 0.00050 | false | |
| CVE-2025-27789 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | @babel/helpers-7.22.6 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Twistlock CVE | Low | ncurses-6.1-10.20180224.el8 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-28.el8_10 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-29041 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | express-4.18.1 | When a user of Express performs a redirect using a userprovided URL Express performs an encode using encodeurl on the contents before passing it to the location header. This can cause malformed URLs to be evaluated in unexpected ways by common redirect allow list implementations in Express applications, leading to an Open Redirect via bypass of a properly implemented allow list.The main method impacted is res.location but this is also called from within res.redirect. | The fix for this involves preparsing the url string with either requirenodeurl.parse or new URL. These are steps you can take on your own before passing the user input string to res.location or res.redirect.More details httpsgithub.comexpressjsexpresssecurityadvisoriesGHSArv95896hc2vc | 0.00043 | false |
| CVE-2025-45582 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-45582 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00042 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8277 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8277 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8277 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5351 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.30-11.el8_10 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-82.el8_10.5 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32611 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32611 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.56.4-166.el8_10 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3177 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3177 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-53382 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | prismjs-1.28.0 | 0.00036 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25629 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-full-i18n-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00035 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25629 | Anchore CVE | Low | npm-1:8.19.4-1.16.20.2.4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00035 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25629 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00035 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25629 | Anchore CVE | Low | nodejs-docs-1:16.20.2-4.module+el8.9.0+21536+8fdee1fb | 0.00035 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-35195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-55565 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nanoid-3.3.6 | It is very rare to allow users to define ID size | Check that user pass real number | 0.00032 | false |
| CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-4156 | Anchore CVE | Low | gawk-4.2.1-4.el8 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00028 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7783 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | form-data-2.3.3 | See the impact section in the attached GHSA. | 0.00024 | false | |
| CVE-2025-7783 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | form-data-3.0.1 | See the impact section in the attached GHSA. | 0.00024 | false | |
| CVE-2024-57360 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5889 | Twistlock CVE | Low | brace-expansion-1.1.11 | Im mirroring the CVE severity assessment here. | Sanitize strings being passed to the function so that they dont contain many , in a row. | 0.00022 | false |
| CVE-2025-5889 | Twistlock CVE | Low | brace-expansion-2.0.1 | Im mirroring the CVE severity assessment here. | Sanitize strings being passed to the function so that they dont contain many , in a row. | 0.00022 | false |
| CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-71.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-42919 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-idna-2.5-7.el8_10 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-42919 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-urllib3-1.24.2-8.el8_10 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-42919 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-chardet-3.0.4-7.el8 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-42919 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-pysocks-1.6.8-3.el8 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-42919 | Twistlock CVE | High | python-requests-2.20.0-6.el8_10 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.30-15.el8 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.30-15.el8 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.26.0-20.el8_10 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30258 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30258 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-libs-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-common-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-tools-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-35512 | Anchore CVE | Low | dbus-daemon-1:1.12.8-27.el8_10 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-25724 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-25724 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8114 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.24.2 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00015 | false |
| CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Anchore CVE | Low | libssh-config-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4878 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libssh-0.9.6-14.el8 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9714 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9714 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-9714 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-21.el8_10.3 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-9.0.3-24.el8 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-8.2-20.el8 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57970 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57970 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.3.3-6.el8_10 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-3219 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 | 0.00012 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7339 | Twistlock CVE | Low | on-headers-1.0.2 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-libs-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-libelf-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Anchore CVE | Medium | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-33294 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | elfutils-0.190-2.el8 | 0.00006 | false | ||
| addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| GHSA-x7hr-w5r2-h6wg | Anchore CVE | Medium | prismjs-1.28.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-wr3j-pwj9-hqq6 | Anchore CVE | High | webpack-dev-middleware-5.3.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-v6h2-p8h4-qcjw | Anchore CVE | Low | brace-expansion-1.1.11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-rv95-896h-c2vc | Anchore CVE | Medium | express-4.18.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-rhx6-c78j-4q9w | Anchore CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-qwcr-r2fm-qrc7 | Anchore CVE | High | body-parser-1.20.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-qwcr-r2fm-qrc7 | Anchore CVE | High | body-parser-1.20.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-qw6h-vgh9-j6wx | Anchore CVE | Low | express-4.18.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-pxg6-pf52-xh8x | Anchore CVE | Low | cookie-0.5.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-prr3-c3m5-p7q2 | Anchore CVE | Medium | @adobe/css-tools-4.2.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-pmh2-wpjm-fj45 | Anchore CVE | High | mysql2-1.7.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-mwcw-c2x4-8c55 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nanoid-3.3.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-mqr2-w7wj-jjgr | Anchore CVE | Medium | mysql2-1.7.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-m6fv-jmcg-4jfg | Anchore CVE | Low | send-0.18.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-j5g3-5c8r-7qfx | Anchore CVE | Low | apollo-server-core-3.12.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-j5g3-5c8r-7qfx | Anchore CVE | Low | @apollo/server-4.7.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-j5g3-5c8r-7qfx | Twistlock CVE | Low | apollo-server-core-3.12.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-j5g3-5c8r-7qfx | Twistlock CVE | Low | @apollo/server-4.7.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-hpx4-r86g-5jrg | Anchore CVE | Medium | @adobe/css-tools-4.2.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-grv7-fg5c-xmjg | Anchore CVE | High | braces-3.0.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-fpw7-j2hg-69v5 | Anchore CVE | Critical | mysql2-1.7.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 | Anchore CVE | Critical | form-data-3.0.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-fjxv-7rqg-78g4 | Anchore CVE | Critical | form-data-2.3.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-cm22-4g7w-348p | Anchore CVE | Low | serve-static-1.15.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j | Anchore CVE | High | path-to-regexp-1.8.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j | Anchore CVE | High | path-to-regexp-1.8.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j | Anchore CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-9pv7-vfvm-6vr7 | Anchore CVE | Medium | graphql-16.7.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-968p-4wvh-cqc8 | Anchore CVE | Medium | @babel/helpers-7.22.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-968p-4wvh-cqc8 | Anchore CVE | Medium | @babel/runtime-7.22.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-95m3-7q98-8xr5 | Anchore CVE | Critical | sha.js-2.4.11 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-952p-6rrq-rcjv | Anchore CVE | Medium | micromatch-4.0.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-7fh5-64p2-3v2j | Anchore CVE | Medium | postcss-8.4.27 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-76p7-773f-r4q5 | Anchore CVE | Medium | serialize-javascript-6.0.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-76c9-3jph-rj3q | Anchore CVE | Low | on-headers-1.0.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-72xf-g2v4-qvf3 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tough-cookie-2.5.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92 | Anchore CVE | Critical | @babel/traverse-7.22.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-4vvj-4cpr-p986 | Anchore CVE | Medium | webpack-5.88.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-4rch-2fh8-94vw | Anchore CVE | Critical | mysql2-1.7.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-4q6p-r6v2-jvc5 | Anchore CVE | High | get-func-name-2.0.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-49j4-86m8-q2jw | Anchore CVE | Medium | mysql2-1.7.0 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-3xgq-45jj-v275 | Anchore CVE | High | cross-spawn-4.0.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-3xgq-45jj-v275 | Anchore CVE | High | cross-spawn-7.0.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-3h5v-q93c-6h6q | Anchore CVE | High | ws-7.5.9 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-36jr-mh4h-2g58 | Anchore CVE | High | d3-color-1.4.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-36jr-mh4h-2g58 | Twistlock CVE | High | d3-color-1.4.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| CCE-89707-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-86473-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-86106-2 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85902-5 | OSCAP Compliance | High | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85899-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85897-7 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-85870-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-84255-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-84254-2 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-82730-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-81044-0 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80935-0 | OSCAP Compliance | High | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80854-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80853-5 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80852-7 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80851-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80839-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80838-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80837-8 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-80664-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=technergetics/anubis-schema-registry&tag=5.5.1&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN