chore(findings): via-science/base-image/conda_build_env
Summary
via-science/base-image/conda_build_env has 235 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-26184 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | poetry-1.1.7 |
CVE-2022-36069 | Twistlock CVE | High | poetry-1.1.7 |
CVE-2022-36070 | Twistlock CVE | High | poetry-1.1.7 |
GHSA-j4j9-7hg9-97g6 | Anchore CVE | High | poetry-1.1.7 |
GHSA-xr2c-5w89-63pv | Anchore CVE | Critical | poetry-1.1.7 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
GHSA-9xgj-fcgf-x6mw | Anchore CVE | High | poetry-1.1.7 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CCE-85987-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-85888-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2022-42966 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | cleo-0.8.1 |
CVE-2022-36227 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-4.el8 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
GHSA-2p9h-ccw7-33gf | Anchore CVE | Medium | cleo-0.8.1 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-36227 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-4.el8 |
CVE-2020-17049 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | krb5-libs-1.18.2-22.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CCE-86099-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
GHSA-43fp-rhv2-5gv8 | Anchore CVE | Medium | certifi-2021.5.30 |
GHSA-43fp-rhv2-5gv8 | Anchore CVE | Medium | certifi-2021.5.30 |
GHSA-43fp-rhv2-5gv8 | Anchore CVE | Medium | certifi-2021.10.8 |
CVE-2021-44568 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libsolv-0.7.20-4.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-44568 | Anchore CVE | Low | libsolv-0.7.20-4.el8_7 |
GHSA-r9hx-vwmv-q579 | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-52.0.0.post20210125 |
GHSA-qwmp-2cf2-g9g6 | Anchore CVE | High | wheel-0.36.2 |
GHSA-qwmp-2cf2-g9g6 | Anchore CVE | High | wheel-0.36.2 |
GHSA-r9hx-vwmv-q579 | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-57.1.0 |
GHSA-r9hx-vwmv-q579 | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-57.1.0 |
GHSA-r9hx-vwmv-q579 | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-52.0.0.post20210125 |
GHSA-qwmp-2cf2-g9g6 | Anchore CVE | High | wheel-0.36.2 |
GHSA-qwmp-2cf2-g9g6 | Anchore CVE | High | wheel-0.36.2 |
CVE-2021-3826 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-3826 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-19244 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-17.el8_7 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-common-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-libs-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-daemon-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-tools-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2020-35512 | Twistlock CVE | Low | dbus-1.12.8-23.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2018-1000654 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtasn1-4.13-4.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-46195 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2021-46195 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-9937 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-17.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-9936 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-17.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2019-14250 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
CVE-2018-20657 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-16.el8_7 |
addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | |
CVE-2017-15412 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2016-5131 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-0663 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-9047 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-9050 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-9049 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-7375 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2016-4658 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-9048 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2017-18258 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-libxml2-2.9.7-15.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-22745 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tpm2-tss-2.3.2-4.el8 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-22745 | Anchore CVE | Low | tpm2-tss-2.3.2-4.el8 |
CCE-83478-8 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-83480-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-86067-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-0286 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2023-25587 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-0215 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-4450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-4304 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2023-25584 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25588 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25586 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25585 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
GHSA-w7pp-m8wf-vj6r | Anchore CVE | Medium | cryptography-3.4.7 |
CVE-2022-4450 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
GHSA-w7pp-m8wf-vj6r | Anchore CVE | Medium | cryptography-3.4.7 |
CVE-2023-0215 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2023-0286 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-4304 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-7.el8_6 |
CVE-2023-23931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | cryptography-3.4.7 |
CVE-2023-0286 | Twistlock CVE | High | cryptography-3.4.7 |
GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 | Anchore CVE | High | cryptography-3.4.7 |
GHSA-x4qr-2fvf-3mr5 | Anchore CVE | High | cryptography-3.4.7 |
CVE-2023-0361 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-5.el8_6 |
CVE-2023-0361 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-5.el8_6 |
CVE-2023-23916 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2023-23916 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2018-20839 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2019-9674 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2018-20406 | Twistlock CVE | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-pam-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Low | systemd-libs-239-68.el8_7.4 |
CVE-2021-20193 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-6.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2019-9923 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.30-6.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-23916 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2022-43552 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-35252 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-3737 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2016-3189 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2018-25032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2021-28861 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-23916 | Anchore CVE | Medium | curl-7.61.1-25.el8_7.2 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2020-10735 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2007-4559 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2013-0340 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2019-12900 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-45061 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-26488 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2015-20107 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-37454 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2022-25927 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-subscription-manager-rhsm-1.28.32-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-25927 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.32-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-25927 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | subscription-manager-rhsm-certificates-1.28.32-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-25927 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-syspurpose-1.28.32-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-25927 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | dnf-plugin-subscription-manager-1.28.32-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-25927 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-cloud-what-1.28.32-1.el8 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python3-libs-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2023-24329 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.9.5 |
CVE-2022-42919 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | platform-python-3.6.8-48.el8_7.1 |
CVE-2023-25585 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25587 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25584 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
CVE-2023-25588 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-8.2-19.el8 |
More information can be found in the failed pipeline located here: https://repo1.dso.mil/dsop/via/base-image/conda-build-env/-/jobs/19289057
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the ~"Hardening::Approval" label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications -
Send approval request to Authorizing Official -
Close issue after approval from Authorizing Official
Note: If the above approval process is rejected for any reason, the
Approval
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theApproval
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.