chore(findings): bitnami/airflow
Summary
bitnami/airflow has 314 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.3 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=bitnami/airflow&tag=2.9.3&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-20012 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssh-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.21811 | false | ||
| CVE-2016-20012 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssh-clients-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.21811 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-1931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.06925 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-1931 | Anchore CVE | Medium | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.06925 | false | ||
| CVE-2005-2541 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.34-7.el9 | 0.03739 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.9-12.el9 | 0.02806 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7264 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.02574 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.02518 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.02518 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-52338 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pyarrow-16.1.0 | 0.02340 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41937 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | apache-airflow-2.9.3 | 0.01547 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45784 | Twistlock CVE | Low | apache-airflow-2.9.3 | 0.01261 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6232 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.01060 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-49767 | Twistlock CVE | High | werkzeug-2.2.3 | Assuming the other conditions listed are met, then it is possible to exploit this. | Configure Request.maxcontentlength. | 0.00875 | false |
| CVE-2024-53899 | Twistlock CVE | High | virtualenv-20.26.3 | 0.00815 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-53899 | Twistlock CVE | High | virtualenv-20.26.1 | 0.00815 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-53899 | Anchore CVE | High | virtualenv-20.26.3 | 0.00815 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50782 | Twistlock CVE | High | cryptography-41.0.7 | 0.00726 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-4032 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00650 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45034 | Twistlock CVE | Low | apache-airflow-2.9.3 | 0.00638 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00624 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-46136 | Twistlock CVE | High | werkzeug-2.2.3 | Most web applications handle form data. If an untrusted user can POST form data, such as with an unauthenticatedpublic form, they could submit file data crafted to take a long time to parse | 0.00410 | false | |
| CVE-2024-9681 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.00348 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9681 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.00348 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9681 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.00348 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00325 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00325 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00325 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00325 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-52804 | Twistlock CVE | High | tornado-6.4.1 | 0.00319 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-21272 | Twistlock CVE | High | mysql-connector-python-9.0.0 | 0.00242 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-pip-wheel-21.3.1-1.el9 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-3572 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python-pip-21.3.1-1.el9 | 0.00240 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-26130 | Twistlock CVE | High | cryptography-41.0.7 | 0.00236 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-40403 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00233 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-40403 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00233 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00232 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00232 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00232 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6345 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-68.2.2 | Most users have migrated off of the code paths that are affected. The affected code paths are actively deprecated and planned for turn down. Only specialized and legacy workflows are affected. | Use recommended installers pip, uv, build, system package managers to install all packages from trusted indexes. If working with untrusted content in private indexes, consider scanning for malicious code in the package index pages. | 0.00227 | false |
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | libcurl-minimal-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.00221 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Anchore CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.00221 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-11053 | Twistlock CVE | Low | curl-7.76.1-31.el9 | 0.00221 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0727 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | cryptography-41.0.7 | 0.00211 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-52304 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | aiohttp-3.9.5 | Most users do not use the Python parser. | Use the default C parser. | 0.00200 | false |
| CVE-2024-37891 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.0.7 | Theres no reason to set ProxyAuthorization without using urllib3s proxy support. | Using the ProxyAuthorization header with urllib3s ProxyManager. Disabling HTTP redirects using redirectsFalse when sending requests. Not using the ProxyAuthorization header. | 0.00198 | false |
| CVE-2025-1153 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00185 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1153 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00185 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-32636 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00179 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-50378 | Twistlock CVE | Low | apache-airflow-2.9.3 | 0.00174 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00166 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45033 | Twistlock CVE | Low | apache-airflow-providers-fab-1.2.2 | 0.00160 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34069 | Twistlock CVE | High | werkzeug-2.2.3 | While anyone using the debugger is technically vulnerable, it requires developers to use the debugger from within an attackercontrolled domain, and for the attacker to guess a URL that will raise an exception and start a debugger. The debugger still requires the developer to enter the debugger pin to enable the vulnerability. Developers should never expect clicking a link on an unfamiliar domain to start their local project, and closing the window if it happens will prevent the vulnerability. | Disable the debuggers interactive features by passing useevalexFalse to runsimple. Do not interact with the debugger unless you navigate to it explicitly. | 0.00156 | false |
| CVE-2017-1000383 | Twistlock CVE | Low | emacs-27.2-14.el9_6.2 | 0.00142 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4517 | Anchore CVE | Critical | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3.11-libs-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00140 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-68.2.2 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | High | setuptools-72.1.0 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Anchore CVE | High | setuptools-68.2.2 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-setuptools-wheel-65.5.1-3.el9 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47273 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-setuptools-65.5.1-3.el9 | 0.00139 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00135 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00135 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30706 | Twistlock CVE | Low | mysql-connector-python-9.0.0 | 0.00122 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-17.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-7531 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00121 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-17.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2020-12413 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00120 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-47287 | Twistlock CVE | High | tornado-6.4.1 | 0.00118 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56326 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | jinja2-3.1.4 | This vulnerability impacts applications which execute untrusted templates. This is uncommon for web and other document rendering use cases, but may be common in deployment tools that allow third party plugins. | 0.00118 | false | |
| CVE-2021-45941 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libbpf-2:1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-45941 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libbpf-1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-45940 | Anchore CVE | Low | libbpf-2:1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2021-45940 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libbpf-1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00117 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4330 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00115 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00115 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4138 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00096 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-12718 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00093 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6923 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00089 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00088 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1632 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00088 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-8088 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00087 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1152 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1150 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00081 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3360 | Anchore CVE | Low | glib2-2.68.4-16.el9_6.2 | 0.00079 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00078 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-libs-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6069 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00077 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00075 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1151 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00075 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-56201 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | jinja2-3.1.4 | This vulnerability impacts applications which execute untrusted templates where the template author can also choose the template filename. This is uncommon for web and other document rendering use cases, but may be common in deployment tools that allow third party plugins. | Check if any template filenames contain curly braces and . If so, and the braces enclose Python code, audit or remove those files. | 0.00074 | false |
| CVE-2025-24023 | Twistlock CVE | Low | flask-appbuilder-4.5.0 | 0.00072 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00071 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30473 | Twistlock CVE | High | apache-airflow-providers-common-sql-1.14.2 | 0.00069 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1377 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00065 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-53643 | Twistlock CVE | Low | aiohttp-3.9.5 | If the above conditions are met which is already unlikely, they are affected. | 0.00064 | false | |
| CVE-2025-4435 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00064 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-syntax-10.40-6.el9 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-10.40-6.el9 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-41409 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pcre2-10.40-6.el9 | 0.00061 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4565 | Twistlock CVE | High | protobuf-4.25.3 | 0.00060 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32990 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00059 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | jinja2-3.1.4 | This vulnerability impacts applications which execute untrusted templates. This is uncommon for web and other document rendering use cases, but may be common in deployment tools that allow third party plugins. | 0.00058 | false | |
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-libs-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8194 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00057 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00055 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-50602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00054 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6395 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-27018 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | apache-airflow-providers-mysql-5.6.2 | 0.00053 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32988 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00052 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-21548 | Twistlock CVE | Low | mysql-connector-python-9.0.0 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-6.2-10.20210508.el9 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-compat-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 | 0.00050 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-49766 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | werkzeug-2.2.3 | Assuming the other conditions listed are met, this is exploitable. | 0.00049 | false | |
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1376 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00048 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgomp-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-devel-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00047 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-30714 | Twistlock CVE | Low | mysql-connector-python-9.0.0 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-9287 | Anchore CVE | High | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-35195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | requests-2.31.0 | 0.00046 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-43859 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | h11-0.14.0 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-29040 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tpm2-tss-3.2.3-1.el9 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-29040 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tpm2-tss-3.2.3-1.el9 | 0.00045 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5914 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5914 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00039 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32962 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | flask-appbuilder-4.5.0 | 0.00038 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | pkgconf-m4-1.7.3-10.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | pkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | pkgconf-pkg-config-1.7.3-10.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | libpkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-24056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 | 0.00037 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.34-7.el9 | 0.00036 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-39804 | Twistlock CVE | Low | tar-1.34-7.el9 | 0.00036 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-40896 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-pip-wheel-22.3.1-5.el9 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-40896 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-pip-22.3.1-5.el9 | 0.00034 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5279 | Twistlock CVE | High | redshift-connector-2.1.2 | 0.00033 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00032 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 0.00031 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-1371 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-29458 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-compat-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-29458 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-6.2-10.20210508.el9 | 0.00029 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32728 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-clients-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32728 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32728 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32415 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32415 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00027 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-47081 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | requests-2.31.0 | 0.00024 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-45582 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tar-1.34-7.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-45582 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.34-7.el9 | 0.00023 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-6827 | Twistlock CVE | High | gunicorn-22.0.0 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57360 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-57360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00022 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python-3.11.9-11 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-libs-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-3.11.11-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4516 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-2.el9_6.1 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-utils-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32989 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gnutls-dane-3.8.3-6.el9 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-0.192-6.el9_6 | 0.00021 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7424 | Anchore CVE | High | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00020 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00019 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5245 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00019 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Twistlock CVE | Low | sqlite-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | 0.00018 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5918 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32414 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-32414 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00017 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-langpack-en-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-devel-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-8058 | Anchore CVE | Medium | glibc-headers-2.34-168.el9_6.20 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-6170 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-10.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-3198 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00016 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7425 | Twistlock CVE | High | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7425 | Anchore CVE | High | libxslt-1.1.34-13.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5917 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Anchore CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5915 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Anchore CVE | Medium | coreutils-single-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-5278 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | coreutils-8.32-39.el9 | 0.00015 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | git-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | git-core-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | git-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | perl-Git-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-48386 | Anchore CVE | Medium | git-core-doc-2.47.3-1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47011 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47010 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47007 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gdb-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | 0.00014 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-2.0.7 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00013 | false |
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | urllib3-1.26.5 | Most users dont disable redirects on the PoolManager. | Set redirectsFalseredirects0 on the .request call instead of on the toplevel urllib3.PoolManager | 0.00013 | false |
| CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-21.3.1-1.el9 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-pip-wheel-22.3.1-5.el9 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-21.3.1-1.el9 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-pip-22.3.1-5.el9 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2024-45314 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | flask-appbuilder-4.5.0 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-30571 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-30571 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.5.3-5.el9_6 | 0.00013 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3.11-pip-wheel-22.3.1-5.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-21.3.1-1.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.11-pip-22.3.1-5.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-50182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python-pip-21.3.1-1.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-4598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-51.el9_6.1 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-51767 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-clients-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-51767 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2023-51767 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-45.el9 | 0.00011 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-3606 | Anchore CVE | Low | libbpf-2:1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00009 | false | ||
| CVE-2022-3606 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libbpf-1.5.0-1.el9 | 0.00009 | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7458 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | sqlite-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7458 | Anchore CVE | Medium | sqlite-libs-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
| CVE-2025-7458 | Anchore CVE | Medium | sqlite-3.34.1-8.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
| CVE-2023-2222 | Anchore CVE | Low | gdb-gdbserver-14.2-4.1.el9_6 | N/A | false | ||
| e07d84b039b0e6fcea42fbda1d378647 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| c7d1f3cd3814412b06a7ff03282f6810 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| c45a3cdf4974ce9efa7f2078409cf7bc | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| b18c88ddeab24abfb92ae2ccddb0b022 | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| addbb93c22e9b0988b8b40392a4538cb | Anchore Compliance | Low | N/A | N/A | |||
| PRISMA-2023-0035 | Twistlock CVE | High | werkzeug-2.2.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
| PRISMA-2023-0024 | Twistlock CVE | High | aiohttp-3.9.5 | N/A | N/A | ||
| PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-24.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
| PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-23.3.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| PRISMA-2022-0168 | Twistlock CVE | High | pip-25.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
| GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | cryptography-41.0.7 | N/A | N/A | ||
| CCE-87567-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-86474-4 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| CCE-86208-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | N/A | N/A | |||
| 9d7be138577efc4d9fdfe0580d849284 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| 40cf73571ff8eeb93b41f263a88fb4dd | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| 1ecec1e40ccbe23f44510a519bf45ad5 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| 154761d2aed489e13b0d2388e6b6599e | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
| 06326817a751383683daa4f085406e9e | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=bitnami/airflow&tag=2.9.3&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Edited by CHORE_TOKEN