chore(findings): security-compass/sd-elements/cam
Summary
security-compass/sd-elements/cam has 85 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
Layer: redhat/ubi/ubi9:9.4 is EOL, please update if possible
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=security-compass/sd-elements/cam&tag=2024.2.2-9.4-001&branch=master
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) provides an estimate of the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.
KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) indicates whether a vulnerability is actively being exploited according to CISA.
id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround | epss_score | kev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-1931 | Anchore CVE | Medium | unbound-libs-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.06753 | false | ||
CVE-2024-1931 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | unbound-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.06753 | false | ||
CVE-2024-56433 | Anchore CVE | Low | shadow-utils-2:4.9-10.el9_5 | 0.04077 | false | ||
CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.01748 | false | ||
CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.01748 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.01024 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.01024 | false | ||
CVE-2025-0938 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.01024 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00393 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00393 | false | ||
CVE-2024-0397 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00393 | false | ||
CVE-2021-23336 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00338 | N/A | ||
CVE-2021-23336 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00338 | N/A | ||
CVE-2021-23336 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3.9-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00338 | N/A | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00203 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00203 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7592 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00203 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00149 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00149 | false | ||
CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00149 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00144 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Anchore CVE | Low | python3-libs-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00144 | false | ||
CVE-2025-1795 | Twistlock CVE | Low | python3.9-3.9.21-1.el9_5 | 0.00144 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34459 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2024-34459 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00139 | false | ||
CVE-2024-21538 | Twistlock CVE | High | cross-spawn-7.0.3 | 0.00132 | false | ||
CVE-2024-29409 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | @nestjs/common-9.4.2 | 0.00114 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-17.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2024-7531 | Twistlock CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | false | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | N/A | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | N/A | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-17.el9_2 | 0.00108 | N/A | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | N/A | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | N/A | ||
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.101.0-10.el9_2 | 0.00108 | N/A | ||
CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00076 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27152 | Twistlock CVE | High | axios-1.6.8 | 0.00071 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27113 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27113 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00050 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32415 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00045 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32415 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00045 | false | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00044 | N/A | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00044 | N/A | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgomp-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00044 | N/A | ||
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | gcc-11.5.0-5.el9_5 | 0.00044 | N/A | ||
CVE-2024-43167 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.00039 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43167 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.00039 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32414 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00033 | false | ||
CVE-2025-32414 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libxml2-2.9.13-6.el9_5.2 | 0.00033 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00033 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00033 | false | ||
CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | 0.00033 | false | ||
CVE-2024-52798 | Twistlock CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | 0.00032 | false | ||
CVE-2025-46653 | Twistlock CVE | Low | formidable-2.1.2 | 0.00030 | false | ||
CVE-2024-55565 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | nanoid-3.3.6 | It is very rare to allow users to define ID size | Check that user pass real number | 0.00030 | false |
CVE-2024-43168 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2024-43168 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-1.16.2-8.el9_5.1 | 0.00028 | false | ||
CVE-2024-11831 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | serialize-javascript-6.0.1 | 0.00027 | false | ||
CVE-2025-23085 | Anchore CVE | Medium | node-18.20.1 | 0.00024 | false | ||
CVE-2025-27789 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | @babel/helpers-7.23.2 | 0.00019 | false | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-libs-252-46.el9_5.3 | 0.00015 | N/A | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-46.el9_5.3 | 0.00015 | N/A | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-252-46.el9_5.3 | 0.00015 | N/A | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Anchore CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-46.el9_5.3 | 0.00015 | N/A | ||
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-46.el9_5.3 | 0.00015 | N/A | ||
b18c88ddeab24abfb92ae2ccddb0b022 | Anchore Compliance | Critical | N/A | N/A | |||
GHSA-rhx6-c78j-4q9w | Anchore CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-rhx6-c78j-4q9w | Anchore CVE | High | path-to-regexp-0.1.7 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-mwcw-c2x4-8c55 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nanoid-3.3.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-mwcw-c2x4-8c55 | Anchore CVE | Medium | nanoid-3.3.6 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-jr5f-v2jv-69x6 | Anchore CVE | High | axios-1.6.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-jr5f-v2jv-69x6 | Anchore CVE | High | axios-1.6.8 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-cj7v-w2c7-cp7c | Anchore CVE | Medium | @nestjs/common-9.4.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-cj7v-w2c7-cp7c | Anchore CVE | Medium | @nestjs/common-9.4.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-968p-4wvh-cqc8 | Anchore CVE | Medium | @babel/helpers-7.23.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-76p7-773f-r4q5 | Anchore CVE | Medium | serialize-javascript-6.0.1 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-75v8-2h7p-7m2m | Anchore CVE | Low | formidable-2.1.2 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-3xgq-45jj-v275 | Anchore CVE | High | cross-spawn-7.0.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-3xgq-45jj-v275 | Anchore CVE | High | cross-spawn-7.0.3 | N/A | N/A | ||
GHSA-3xgq-45jj-v275 | Anchore CVE | High | cross-spawn-7.0.3 | N/A | N/A |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=security-compass/sd-elements/cam&tag=2024.2.2-9.4-001&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.