Doc arch eckoperator 311

Summary

(Summarize the purpose of the MR)

Relevant logs/screenshots

(Include any relevant logs/screenshots)

/cc @someoneelse

added eckoperator statusreview labels

mentioned in issue #311 (closed)

When I asked Tom, he mentioned that given how trivial operators are we probably should leave out architecture docs for them (see Mattermost).

I think Ryan's MR here - https://repo1.dso.mil/platform-one/big-bang/bigbang/-/merge_requests/408 - handles the operator architecture discussion well enough.

concurring with this, going to close this in favor of !408 (merged). If we see demand for tuning the operator I think we re-evaluate this decision, but I've yet to hear of a customer wanting to configure an operator outside of the simple tuning (like replicasets)

mentioned in merge request !408 (merged)

closed