chore(findings): huron-digital-pathology/lagotto-data-gateway
Summary
huron-digital-pathology/lagotto-data-gateway has 140 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2015-5237 | anchore_cve | High | google.golang.org/protobuf-v1.28.0 |
CVE-2021-22570 | anchore_cve | High | google.golang.org/protobuf-v1.28.0 |
CVE-2021-3634 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2021-3737 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2021-4189 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2021-3634 | twistlock_cve | Low | libssh-config-0.9.4-3.el8 |
CVE-2021-3634 | twistlock_cve | Low | libssh-0.9.4-3.el8 |
CVE-2022-27782 | anchore_cve | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-27782 | anchore_cve | Medium | curl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-1621 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1629 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-27782 | twistlock_cve | Medium | curl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-27782 | twistlock_cve | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2021-44568 | twistlock_cve | Low | libsolv-0.7.19-1.el8 |
CVE-2021-44568 | anchore_cve | Low | libsolv-0.7.19-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-1621 | anchore_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1629 | anchore_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1271 | twistlock_cve | Critical | xz-libs-5.2.4-3.el8 |
CVE-2022-1897 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1785 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1785 | anchore_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1897 | anchore_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1292 | anchore_cve | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-1292 | anchore_cve | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-1271 | anchore_cve | High | xz-libs-5.2.4-3.el8 |
CVE-2022-1927 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1927 | anchore_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1271 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-2129 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2126 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2125 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2124 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2068 | twistlock_cve | Medium | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2068 | twistlock_cve | Medium | openssl-1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2068 | anchore_cve | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2068 | anchore_cve | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2175 | twistlock_cve | Critical | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-32206 | twistlock_cve | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32206 | twistlock_cve | Medium | curl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32208 | twistlock_cve | Medium | curl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32208 | twistlock_cve | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32208 | anchore_cve | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32208 | anchore_cve | Medium | curl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32206 | anchore_cve | Medium | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-32206 | anchore_cve | Medium | curl-7.61.1-22.el8 |
CVE-2022-2175 | anchore_cve | Low | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2183 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2182 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2207 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2206 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2231 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2210 | twistlock_cve | Medium | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2208 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2257 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-1621 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-1629 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-29824 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-25313 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-25314 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-22576 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-27774 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-27776 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-27782 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2021-40528 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-2288 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2289 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2286 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2285 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2284 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2287 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-33099 | twistlock_cve | Medium | lua-libs-5.3.4-12.el8 |
CVE-2022-34903 | twistlock_cve | Medium | python3-gpg-1.13.1-9.el8 |
CVE-2022-34903 | twistlock_cve | Medium | gnupg2-2.2.20-2.el8 |
CVE-2022-34903 | twistlock_cve | Medium | gpgme-1.13.1-9.el8 |
CVE-2022-2097 | twistlock_cve | Medium | openssl-1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2097 | twistlock_cve | Medium | openssl-libs-1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2097 | anchore_cve | Medium | openssl-libs-1:1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2097 | anchore_cve | Medium | openssl-1:1.1.1k-6.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-2124 | anchore_cve | Low | vim-minimal-2:8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2019-17543 | twistlock_cve | Medium | lz4-libs-1.8.3-3.el8_4 |
CVE-2020-17049 | twistlock_cve | Medium | krb5-libs-1.18.2-14.el8 |
CVE-2018-20839 | twistlock_cve | Medium | systemd-pam-239-51.el8_5.5 |
CVE-2018-20839 | twistlock_cve | Medium | systemd-239-51.el8_5.5 |
CVE-2018-20839 | twistlock_cve | Medium | systemd-libs-239-51.el8_5.5 |
CVE-2022-0235 | twistlock_cve | Medium | python3-syspurpose-1.28.21-5.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-0235 | twistlock_cve | Medium | python3-subscription-manager-rhsm-1.28.21-5.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-0235 | twistlock_cve | Medium | subscription-manager-1.28.21-5.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-0235 | twistlock_cve | Medium | subscription-manager-rhsm-certificates-1.28.21-5.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-0235 | twistlock_cve | Medium | python3-cloud-what-1.28.21-5.el8_5 |
CVE-2021-39537 | twistlock_cve | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2021-39537 | twistlock_cve | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2018-16428 | twistlock_cve | Low | glib2-2.56.4-156.el8 |
CVE-2020-21674 | twistlock_cve | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-3.el8_5 |
CVE-2019-9674 | twistlock_cve | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-41.el8 |
CVE-2019-9674 | twistlock_cve | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-41.el8 |
CVE-2019-19244 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2021-3927 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2021-4166 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2020-35512 | twistlock_cve | Low | dbus-common-1.12.8-14.el8 |
CVE-2020-35512 | twistlock_cve | Low | dbus-1.12.8-14.el8 |
CVE-2020-35512 | twistlock_cve | Low | dbus-daemon-1.12.8-14.el8 |
CVE-2020-35512 | twistlock_cve | Low | dbus-libs-1.12.8-14.el8 |
CVE-2020-35512 | twistlock_cve | Low | dbus-tools-1.12.8-14.el8 |
CVE-2022-0351 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2021-4209 | twistlock_cve | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-4.el8 |
CVE-2021-43618 | twistlock_cve | Low | gmp-6.1.2-10.el8 |
CVE-2020-12413 | twistlock_cve | Low | nss-util-3.67.0-7.el8_5 |
CVE-2020-12413 | twistlock_cve | Low | nss-sysinit-3.67.0-7.el8_5 |
CVE-2020-12413 | twistlock_cve | Low | nss-softokn-3.67.0-7.el8_5 |
CVE-2020-12413 | twistlock_cve | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.67.0-7.el8_5 |
CVE-2020-12413 | twistlock_cve | Low | nss-3.67.0-7.el8_5 |
CVE-2018-20406 | twistlock_cve | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-41.el8 |
CVE-2018-20406 | twistlock_cve | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-41.el8 |
CVE-2022-1720 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2021-3997 | twistlock_cve | Low | systemd-239-51.el8_5.5 |
CVE-2021-3997 | twistlock_cve | Low | systemd-libs-239-51.el8_5.5 |
CVE-2021-3997 | twistlock_cve | Low | systemd-pam-239-51.el8_5.5 |
CVE-2021-24032 | twistlock_cve | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 |
CVE-2018-20786 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2018-19211 | twistlock_cve | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2018-19211 | twistlock_cve | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2019-8906 | twistlock_cve | Low | file-libs-5.33-20.el8 |
CVE-2019-8905 | twistlock_cve | Low | file-libs-5.33-20.el8 |
CVE-2019-12900 | twistlock_cve | Low | bzip2-libs-1.0.6-26.el8 |
CVE-2018-1000654 | twistlock_cve | Low | libtasn1-4.13-3.el8 |
CVE-2021-46195 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-4.el8_5 |
CVE-2021-46195 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-4.el8_5 |
CVE-2021-20193 | twistlock_cve | Low | tar-1.30-5.el8 |
CVE-2019-9937 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2019-9936 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2019-9923 | twistlock_cve | Low | tar-1.30-5.el8 |
CVE-2019-14250 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-4.el8_5 |
CVE-2019-14250 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-4.el8_5 |
CVE-2018-20657 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-4.el8_5 |
CVE-2018-20657 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-4.el8_5 |
CVE-2018-1000880 | twistlock_cve | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-3.el8_5 |
CVE-2018-1000879 | twistlock_cve | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-3.el8_5 |
CVE-2021-3974 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2344 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
CVE-2022-2343 | twistlock_cve | Low | vim-minimal-8.0.1763-16.el8_5.13 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/container/11187?branch=master
More information can be found in the failed pipeline located here: https://repo1.dso.mil/dsop/huron-digital-pathology/lagotto-data-gateway/-/jobs/11717155
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the ~"Approval" label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications -
Send approval request to Authorizing Official -
Close issue after approval from Authorizing Official
Note: If the above approval process is rejected for any reason, the
Approval
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theApproval
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.