chore(findings): opensource/fluentd/fluentd
Summary
opensource/fluentd/fluentd has 93 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-52445 | Anchore CVE | Low | kernel-headers-5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-52448 | Anchore CVE | Low | kernel-headers-5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-26603 | Anchore CVE | Low | kernel-headers-5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-26605 | Anchore CVE | Low | kernel-headers-5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-26602 | Anchore CVE | Medium | kernel-headers-5.14.0-362.18.1.el9_3 |
CCE-86249-0 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-83611-4 | OSCAP Compliance | High | |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygems-3.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-default-gems-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-libs-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-io-console-0.5.7-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-json-2.5.1-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bigdecimal-3.0.0-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bundler-2.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-psych-3.3.2-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-33621 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-rdoc-6.3.3-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-45078 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-45078 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-1579 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-1579 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-7008 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2023-7008 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2023-7008 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2024-22365 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | pam-1.5.1-15.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-rpm-macros-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2021-3997 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | systemd-pam-252-18.el9 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bigdecimal-3.0.0-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bundler-2.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-rdoc-6.3.3-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-default-gems-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-io-console-0.5.7-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-libs-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygems-3.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-psych-3.3.2-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36617 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-json-2.5.1-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-io-console-0.5.7-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-psych-3.3.2-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygems-3.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-json-2.5.1-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bigdecimal-3.0.0-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-rdoc-6.3.3-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-default-gems-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-libs-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28756 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bundler-2.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-io-console-0.5.7-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bundler-2.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygems-3.2.33-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-rdoc-6.3.3-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-libs-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-default-gems-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ruby-3.0.4-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-json-2.5.1-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-psych-3.3.2-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-28755 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | rubygem-bigdecimal-3.0.0-160.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-20197 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-20197 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-44840 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-44840 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-3826 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2021-3826 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-6129 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-6237 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-0727 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-24056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pkgconf-m4-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2023-24056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2023-24056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libpkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2023-24056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | pkgconf-pkg-config-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47011 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47010 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47008 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47008 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-47007 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-38533 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-38533 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | cpp-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libgomp-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2023-5678 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-3817 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-3446 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-2975 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Twistlock CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2023-1972 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9 |
CVE-2023-1972 | Twistlock CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/fluentd/fluentd&tag=1.16.3&branch=master
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/fluentd/fluentd&tag=1.16.3&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.