chore(findings): opensource/gdal/gdal
Summary
opensource/gdal/gdal has 65 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-41862 | Anchore CVE | Low | libpq-13.5-1.el8 |
CVE-2021-29390 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3-12.el8 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python38-libs-3.8.16-1.module+el8.8.0+18967+20d359ae.1 |
CVE-2023-27043 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python38-3.8.16-1.module+el8.8.0+18967+20d359ae.1 |
CVE-2023-25433 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-26966 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-4645 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-3570 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-30775 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-3576 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-30774 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-38288 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-38289 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-1916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-20225 | Anchore CVE | High | pip-23.3 |
CCE-84036-3 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-86534-5 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-85888-6 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CCE-84038-9 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2020-35538 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3-12.el8 |
CVE-2022-3857 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libpng-1.6.34-5.el8 |
CVE-2019-7317 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libpng-1.6.34-5.el8 |
CVE-2022-41862 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libpq-13.5-1.el8 |
CVE-2021-29390 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3-12.el8 |
CVE-2022-40897 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python38-setuptools-41.6.0-5.module+el8.5.0+12205+a865257a |
CVE-2022-40897 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python38-setuptools-wheel-41.6.0-5.module+el8.5.0+12205+a865257a |
CVE-2017-17095 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-41175 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-40745 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-3618 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-40090 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-3599 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-3598 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-30775 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-30774 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-0798 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-0797 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-0796 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-0795 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-4645 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-3576 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-3316 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-3164 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-30086 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-26966 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-26965 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-25435 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-25434 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-25433 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-0799 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-3570 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-16335 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-15209 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-6128 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-1916 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-1354 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-1056 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2020-18768 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-10779 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-17101 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-5360 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-19210 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-10801 | Twistlock CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-25091 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python38-pip-19.3.1-6.module+el8.7.0+15823+8950cfa7 |
CVE-2018-25091 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python38-pip-wheel-19.3.1-6.module+el8.7.0+15823+8950cfa7 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/gdal/gdal&tag=v3.5.1&branch=master
More information can be found in the failed pipeline located here: https://repo1.dso.mil/dsop/opensource/gdal/gdal/-/jobs/23396393
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the ~"Hardening::Verification" label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.