chore(findings): opensource/jaegertracing/jaeger-query (arm64)
Summary
opensource/jaegertracing/jaeger-query (arm64) has 83 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/jaegertracing/jaeger-query&tag=1.66.0-arm64&branch=master
| id | source | severity | package | impact | workaround |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-0204 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0205 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0206 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0209 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0286 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0287 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0288 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0292 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-0293 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-1790 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-1791 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-3194 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-3195 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-3197 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-3216 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-4000 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2015-7575 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0702 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0703 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0704 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0705 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0797 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0799 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-0800 | Twistlock CVE | High | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2105 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2106 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2107 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2108 | Twistlock CVE | High | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2109 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2177 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2178 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2179 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2181 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2182 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2183 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-2842 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-6302 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-6304 | Twistlock CVE | High | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-6306 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-7055 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-7056 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2016-8610 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2017-3731 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2017-3732 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2017-3735 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2017-3736 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2017-3737 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2018-0495 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2018-0732 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2018-0734 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2018-0737 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2018-0739 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2018-5407 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2019-1547 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2019-1549 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2019-1551 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2019-1559 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2019-1563 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2020-1968 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2021-23839 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2021-23840 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2021-23841 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2021-3712 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2022-0778 | Twistlock CVE | High | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2022-1292 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2022-2068 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2022-2097 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2022-4304 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2022-4450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-0215 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-0286 | Twistlock CVE | High | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-0464 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-0465 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-0466 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-2650 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2023-2975 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-13176 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssl-libs-1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-41996 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-4741 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-5535 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 | ||
| CVE-2024-9143 | Twistlock CVE | Low | openssl-3.2.2-6.el9_5.1 |
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=opensource/jaegertracing/jaeger-query&tag=1.66.0-arm64&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
- Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs)
- Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
- Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verificationlabel will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerificationlabel.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.
Activity
- A deleted user
added ContainerNew Findings SeverityHigh StatusTo-Do labels
- A deleted user
set weight to 83
added OwnerIronbank PRIORITY1 labels
- A deleted user
closed
Please register or sign in to reply