chore(findings): redhat/openjdk/openjdk11-devel
Summary
redhat/openjdk/openjdk11-devel has 63 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-51257 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2022-48622 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdk-pixbuf2-modules-2.36.12-5.el8 |
CVE-2022-48622 | Anchore CVE | Medium | gdk-pixbuf2-2.36.12-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-15209 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-52356 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-52355 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2017-6519 | Anchore CVE | Low | avahi-libs-0.7-21.el8_9.1 |
CVE-2019-7317 | Anchore CVE | Low | libpng-2:1.6.34-5.el8 |
CVE-2019-6461 | Anchore CVE | Low | cairo-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2018-19540 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-16335 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2017-5503 | Anchore CVE | Medium | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-19542 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2022-3857 | Anchore CVE | Low | java-11-openjdk-devel-1:11.0.23.0.9-3.el8 |
CVE-2023-0795 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-3599 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2017-9782 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-19539 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2023-0798 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-1354 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-20622 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-17101 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-2201 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3-12.el8 |
CVE-2018-19543 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2021-3467 | Anchore CVE | Medium | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-5360 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-6128 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-4504 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cups-libs-1:2.2.6-54.el8_9 |
CVE-2018-19139 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-10801 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-30086 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-6462 | Anchore CVE | Low | cairo-gobject-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2018-9055 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2017-5499 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2022-3857 | Anchore CVE | Low | java-11-openjdk-headless-1:11.0.23.0.9-3.el8 |
CVE-2018-18064 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cairo-gobject-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2022-3598 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-6462 | Anchore CVE | Low | cairo-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2023-0797 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2017-5505 | Anchore CVE | Medium | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2023-6277 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-20570 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-19210 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-0796 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2019-6461 | Anchore CVE | Low | cairo-gobject-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2018-19876 | Anchore CVE | Low | cairo-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2017-17095 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2018-19541 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-9252 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2023-0799 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2021-25317 | Anchore CVE | Low | cups-libs-1:2.2.6-54.el8_9 |
CVE-2018-18873 | Anchore CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2020-13790 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libjpeg-turbo-1.5.3-12.el8 |
CVE-2022-3857 | Anchore CVE | Low | java-11-openjdk-1:11.0.23.0.9-3.el8 |
CVE-2018-19876 | Anchore CVE | Low | cairo-gobject-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2017-5504 | Anchore CVE | Medium | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
CVE-2018-18064 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cairo-1.15.12-6.el8 |
CVE-2018-10779 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-52356 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2023-52355 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.0.9-29.el8_8 |
CVE-2022-48622 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdk-pixbuf2-modules-2.36.12-5.el8 |
CVE-2022-48622 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | gdk-pixbuf2-2.36.12-5.el8 |
CVE-2023-51257 | Twistlock CVE | Low | jasper-libs-2.0.14-5.el8 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=redhat/openjdk/openjdk11-devel&tag=1.11&branch=master
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=redhat/openjdk/openjdk11-devel&tag=1.11&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.