chore(findings): rook/ceph
Summary
rook/ceph has 279 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
d4635cb1e01f58e4aeeafef57f096983 | Anchore Compliance | Low | |
CVE-2022-4450 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rbd-nbd-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-syntax-10.40-2.el9 |
CVE-2023-4156 | Anchore CVE | Low | gawk-5.1.0-6.el9 |
CVE-2022-2097 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36632 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-3606 | Anchore CVE | Low | libbpf-2:1.2.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2023-39742 | Anchore CVE | Low | giflib-5.2.1-9.el9 |
CVE-2021-32256 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2019-25059 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgs-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2022-3554 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libX11-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-default-yama-scope-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2022-32148 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-ceph-common-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | pkgconf-m4-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2023-39325 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mds-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2022-28131 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-fuse-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-ceph-common-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2020-18771 | Anchore CVE | Low | exiv2-libs-0.27.5-2.el9 |
CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | pkgconf-pkg-config-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-3.34.1-7.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.34.1-7.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rbd-fuse-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libradosstriper1-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-volume-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-common-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-46751 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-tools-printing-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-exporter-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-39326 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2023-2004 | Anchore CVE | Low | freetype-2.10.4-9.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | librbd1-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-32189 | Anchore CVE | Low | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | pkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | librgw2-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-selinux-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nspr-4.35.0-6.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-51767 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-server-8.7p1-34.el9_3.3 |
CVE-2022-1708 | Anchore CVE | Medium | conmon-2:2.1.8-1.el9 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libelf-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2023-39319 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2022-1292 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-selinux-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-1579 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-39321 | Anchore CVE | Medium | conmon-2:2.1.8-1.el9 |
CVE-2022-29458 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2021-45940 | Anchore CVE | Low | libbpf-2:1.2.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2019-25059 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2022-29458 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-common-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-4899 | Anchore CVE | Low | libzstd-1.5.1-2.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-ceph-argparse-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-4504 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cups-libs-1:2.3.3op2-21.el9 |
CVE-2022-3555 | Anchore CVE | Low | libX11-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libatomic-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2022-4123 | Anchore CVE | Low | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-volume-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2020-18771 | Anchore CVE | Low | exiv2-0.27.5-2.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cephadm-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2021-3826 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-1916 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcephfs2-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | librados2-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rados-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-1705 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-30633 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-1056 | Anchore CVE | Low | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2021-3782 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libwayland-server-1.21.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2023-39323 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2021-45078 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-osd-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2021-31535 | Anchore CVE | High | libX11-xcb-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-3.90.0-6.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mds-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | librados2-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rgw-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2024-0727 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-25435 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2023-46751 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-39804 | Anchore CVE | Low | tar-2:1.34-6.el9_1 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cephadm-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-3219 | Anchore CVE | Low | gnupg2-2.3.3-4.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cephfs-mirror-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgomp-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mon-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-30632 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-1972 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-38533 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-30571 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libarchive-3.5.3-4.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-test-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-27664 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-36191 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-libs-3.34.1-7.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mgr-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mon-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-2068 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2022-3857 | Anchore CVE | Low | libpng-2:1.6.37-12.el9 |
CVE-2021-25317 | Anchore CVE | Low | cups-libs-1:2.3.3op2-21.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-fuse-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-3446 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-1972 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-41409 | Anchore CVE | Low | pcre2-10.40-2.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | librbd1-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-libs-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2023-46751 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-x11-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-0215 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2017-17973 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2022-30630 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-3.90.0-6.el9_3 |
CVE-2021-3826 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2021-3782 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libwayland-egl-1.21.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-util-3.90.0-6.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rbd-mirror-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-45285 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-cephfs-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-45803 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-21.2.3-7.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rados-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-2650 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-5678 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-36632 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-52355 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-sysinit-3.90.0-6.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-52356 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2023-51767 | Anchore CVE | Medium | openssh-8.7p1-34.el9_3.3 |
CVE-2022-33070 | Anchore CVE | Low | protobuf-c-1.3.3-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-44487 | Anchore CVE | High | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2023-3817 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rbd-fuse-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mgr-modules-core-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-36191 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-devel-3.34.1-7.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-libs-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2019-25059 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-tools-printing-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2021-32256 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-gold-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-36191 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-3.34.1-7.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-4304 | Anchore CVE | Medium | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2021-38561 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-50495 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2020-12413 | Anchore CVE | Low | nss-softokn-freebl-3.90.0-6.el9_3 |
CVE-2016-20012 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssh-server-8.7p1-34.el9_3.3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-osd-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2021-31535 | Anchore CVE | High | libX11-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-test-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-29458 | Anchore CVE | Low | ncurses-base-6.2-10.20210508.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcephfs2-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2021-45078 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-48161 | Anchore CVE | Medium | giflib-5.2.1-9.el9 |
CVE-2023-45803 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-pip-21.2.3-7.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rgw-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcephsqlite-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2021-3782 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libwayland-cursor-1.21.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2022-3555 | Anchore CVE | Low | libX11-xcb-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libstdc++-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2024-0232 | Anchore CVE | Low | sqlite-devel-3.34.1-7.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-1962 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-3554 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libX11-common-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2023-46751 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-tools-fonts-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2022-27943 | Anchore CVE | Low | libgcc-11.4.1-2.1.el9 |
CVE-2022-2879 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-3554 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libX11-xcb-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-cephfs-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-immutable-object-cache-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mgr-modules-core-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libradosstriper1-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2024-25260 | Anchore CVE | Low | elfutils-debuginfod-client-0.189-3.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | cephfs-mirror-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-39318 | Anchore CVE | Medium | stdlib-go1.20.7 |
CVE-2022-4122 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-2880 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-mgr-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-immutable-object-cache-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libcephsqlite-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-24056 | Anchore CVE | Low | libpkgconf-1.7.3-10.el9 |
CVE-2022-3555 | Anchore CVE | Low | libX11-common-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2021-31535 | Anchore CVE | High | libX11-common-1.7.0-8.el9 |
CVE-2016-20012 | Anchore CVE | Low | openssh-8.7p1-34.el9_3.3 |
CVE-2023-46751 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libgs-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-6277 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libtiff-4.4.0-10.el9 |
CVE-2021-45941 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libbpf-2:1.2.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rbd-nbd-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-ceph-argparse-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2021-3782 | Anchore CVE | Medium | libwayland-client-1.21.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-base-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-0466 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-exporter-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-0464 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | rbd-mirror-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-radosgw-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2023-0465 | Anchore CVE | Low | compat-openssl11-1:1.1.1k-4.el9_0 |
CVE-2023-45322 | Anchore CVE | Low | libxml2-2.9.13-5.el9_3 |
CVE-2019-25059 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-tools-fonts-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2022-32149 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-base-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | librgw2-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rbd-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-0529 | Anchore CVE | Low | unzip-6.0-56.el9 |
CVE-2019-25059 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ghostscript-x11-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2022-21681 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | ceph-radosgw-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2022-38533 | Anchore CVE | Low | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2005-2541 | Anchore CVE | Medium | tar-2:1.34-6.el9_1 |
CVE-2022-41715 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2023-1579 | Anchore CVE | Medium | binutils-2.35.2-42.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2022-0530 | Anchore CVE | Low | unzip-6.0-56.el9 |
CVE-2022-21680 | Anchore CVE | Medium | python3-rbd-2:18.2.2-1.el9s |
CVE-2024-24786 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-33655 | Anchore CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-3.el9_3.5 |
CVE-2023-45290 | Anchore CVE | Medium | podman-2:4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-28834 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2024-28835 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2024-1753 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2024-24786 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-38469 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-38470 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-38471 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-38472 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-38473 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-25193 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-37328 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2021-29390 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2022-40090 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-3618 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-40745 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-41175 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-6228 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-47038 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-39326 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-45287 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2022-33065 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-43788 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-43789 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-43785 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-43786 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-43787 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2014-1745 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-32359 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-39928 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-40414 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-41983 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-42852 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-42883 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-42890 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2024-23206 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2024-23213 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2024-25062 | OSCAP Compliance | Medium | |
CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-6597 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2024-33599 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | glibc-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33599 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | glibc-common-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33599 | Twistlock CVE | Critical | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-libs-3.9.18-1.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2024-0450 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-3.9.18-1.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2024-33600 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-common-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33600 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33600 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2023-45803 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-pip-wheel-21.2.3-7.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2023-45803 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | python3-pip-21.2.3-7.el9_3.1 |
CVE-2024-29040 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | tpm2-tss-3.2.2-2.el9 |
CVE-2024-33602 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33602 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glibc-common-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33602 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glibc-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33601 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glibc-minimal-langpack-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33601 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glibc-common-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2024-33601 | Twistlock CVE | Low | glibc-2.34-83.el9_3.12 |
CVE-2023-52722 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ghostscript-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-52722 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ghostscript-x11-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-52722 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ghostscript-tools-printing-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-52722 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | libgs-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2023-52722 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | ghostscript-tools-fonts-9.54.0-13.el9 |
CVE-2024-34397 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | glib2-2.68.4-11.el9 |
CVE-2024-3727 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | podman-4.6.1-8.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-3727 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | aardvark-dns-1.7.0-1.el9 |
CVE-2024-3727 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | conmon-2.1.8-1.el9 |
CVE-2024-3727 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | netavark-1.7.0-2.el9_3 |
CVE-2024-3727 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | containers-common-1-55.el9 |
CVE-2024-24788 | Twistlock CVE | Medium | conmon-2.1.8-1.el9 |
CVE-2024-33655 | Twistlock CVE | Low | unbound-libs-1.16.2-3.el9_3.5 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=rook/ceph&tag=v1.14.3&branch=master
More information can be found in the VAT located here: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/image?imageName=rook/ceph&tag=v1.14.0&branch=master
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the StatusVerification label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications
Note: If the above process is rejected for any reason, the
Verification
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theVerification
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.