chore(findings): sysdig/sysdig-secure/cloud-scanning
Summary
sysdig/sysdig-secure/cloud-scanning has 94 new findings discovered during continuous monitoring.
id | source | severity | package |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2022-24675 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-28327 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2021-35937 | anchore_cve | Medium | rpm-libs-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35938 | anchore_cve | Medium | rpm-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35939 | anchore_cve | Medium | rpm-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35938 | anchore_cve | Medium | rpm-libs-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35937 | anchore_cve | Medium | rpm-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35939 | anchore_cve | Medium | rpm-libs-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2022-1304 | anchore_cve | Medium | libcom_err-1.45.6-4.el8 |
CVE-2021-44568 | anchore_cve | Low | libsolv-0.7.20-1.el8 |
CVE-2022-27943 | anchore_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-27943 | anchore_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
PRISMA-2022-0270 | twistlock_cve | Medium | github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4-v4.2.0 |
CVE-2022-2509 | anchore_cve | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-4.el8 |
CVE-2022-37434 | anchore_cve | Medium | zlib-1.2.11-18.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-30580 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-32189 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-30635 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-30633 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-30632 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-30631 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-30630 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-28131 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2022-32148 | twistlock_cve | Medium | go-1.17.8 |
CCE-88248-0 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CCE-86107-0 | oscap_comp | Medium | |
CVE-2022-30629 | twistlock_cve | Low | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2019-17543 | twistlock_cve | Medium | lz4-libs-1.8.3-3.el8_4 |
CVE-2022-2509 | twistlock_cve | Medium | gnutls-3.6.16-4.el8 |
CVE-2020-17049 | twistlock_cve | Medium | krb5-libs-1.18.2-14.el8 |
CVE-2022-37434 | twistlock_cve | Medium | zlib-1.2.11-18.el8_5 |
CVE-2022-1705 | twistlock_cve | Medium | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2021-35939 | twistlock_cve | Medium | rpm-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35939 | twistlock_cve | Medium | rpm-libs-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35938 | twistlock_cve | Medium | rpm-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35938 | twistlock_cve | Medium | rpm-libs-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35937 | twistlock_cve | Medium | rpm-libs-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2021-35937 | twistlock_cve | Medium | rpm-4.14.3-23.el8 |
CVE-2016-3709 | twistlock_cve | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-13.el8_6.1 |
CVE-2022-1304 | twistlock_cve | Medium | libcom_err-1.45.6-4.el8 |
CVE-2022-1962 | twistlock_cve | Medium | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2021-39537 | twistlock_cve | Medium | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2021-39537 | twistlock_cve | Medium | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2018-16428 | twistlock_cve | Low | glib2-2.56.4-158.el8 |
CVE-2020-21674 | twistlock_cve | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-3.el8_5 |
CVE-2019-19244 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2021-4209 | twistlock_cve | Low | gnutls-3.6.16-4.el8 |
CVE-2021-44568 | twistlock_cve | Low | libsolv-0.7.20-1.el8 |
CVE-2021-43618 | twistlock_cve | Low | gmp-6.1.2-10.el8 |
CVE-2022-27943 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-27943 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2021-24032 | twistlock_cve | Low | libzstd-1.4.4-1.el8 |
CVE-2018-19211 | twistlock_cve | Low | ncurses-base-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2018-19211 | twistlock_cve | Low | ncurses-libs-6.1-9.20180224.el8 |
CVE-2019-8906 | twistlock_cve | Low | file-libs-5.33-20.el8 |
CVE-2019-8905 | twistlock_cve | Low | file-libs-5.33-20.el8 |
CVE-2019-12900 | twistlock_cve | Low | bzip2-libs-1.0.6-26.el8 |
CVE-2018-1000654 | twistlock_cve | Low | libtasn1-4.13-3.el8 |
CVE-2021-46195 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2021-46195 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2019-9937 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2019-9936 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2019-14250 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2019-14250 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2018-20657 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2018-20657 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2018-1000880 | twistlock_cve | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-3.el8_5 |
CVE-2018-1000879 | twistlock_cve | Low | libarchive-3.3.3-3.el8_5 |
CVE-2016-3709 | anchore_cve | Medium | libxml2-2.9.7-13.el8_6.1 |
CVE-2020-35527 | twistlock_cve | Medium | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2020-35525 | twistlock_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2021-3826 | twistlock_cve | Low | libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2021-3826 | twistlock_cve | Low | libstdc++-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6 |
CVE-2020-35527 | anchore_cve | Medium | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2020-35525 | anchore_cve | Low | sqlite-libs-3.26.0-15.el8 |
CVE-2022-35252 | twistlock_cve | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8_6.4 |
CVE-2022-35252 | twistlock_cve | Low | curl-7.61.1-22.el8_6.4 |
CVE-2022-35252 | anchore_cve | Low | libcurl-7.61.1-22.el8_6.4 |
CVE-2022-35252 | anchore_cve | Low | curl-7.61.1-22.el8_6.4 |
CVE-2022-27664 | twistlock_cve | High | go-1.17.8 |
CVE-2020-10735 | twistlock_cve | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2020-10735 | twistlock_cve | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2018-20839 | twistlock_cve | Medium | systemd-libs-239-58.el8_6.7 |
CVE-2019-9674 | twistlock_cve | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2019-9674 | twistlock_cve | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2018-20406 | twistlock_cve | Low | python3-libs-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2018-20406 | twistlock_cve | Low | platform-python-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2021-3997 | twistlock_cve | Low | systemd-libs-239-58.el8_6.7 |
CVE-2020-10735 | anchore_cve | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2020-10735 | anchore_cve | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2021-28861 | anchore_cve | Medium | platform-python-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2021-28861 | anchore_cve | Medium | python3-libs-3.6.8-47.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-3219 | twistlock_cve | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
CVE-2022-3219 | anchore_cve | Low | gnupg2-2.2.20-3.el8_6 |
VAT: https://vat.dso.mil/vat/container/18539?branch=master
More information can be found in the failed pipeline located here: https://repo1.dso.mil/dsop/sysdig/sysdig-secure/cloud-scanning/-/jobs/11711683
Tasks
Contributor:
-
Provide justifications for findings in the VAT (docs) -
Apply the ~"Approval" label to this issue and wait for feedback
Iron Bank:
-
Review findings and justifications -
Send approval request to Authorizing Official -
Close issue after approval from Authorizing Official
Note: If the above approval process is rejected for any reason, the
Approval
label will be removed and the issue will be sent back toOpen
. Any comments will be listed in this issue for you to address. Once they have been addressed, you must re-add theApproval
label.
Questions?
Contact the Iron Bank team by commenting on this issue with your questions or concerns. If you do not receive a response, add /cc @ironbank-notifications/onboarding
.
Additionally, Iron Bank hosts an AMA working session every Wednesday from 1630-1730EST to answer questions.